2020 US General Election

[Niall_Quinn]

Swamp creature Brennan speaks:

"The fact...that he has the powers of the presidency in his hands is quite worrisome," Brennan told CNN's Chris Cuomo.

"If Vice President Pence and the cabinet had an ounce of fortitude and spine and patriotism, I think they would seriously consider invoking the 25th Amendment and pushing Donald Trump out because he is just very unpredictable now," he continued. "I'm very concerned what he might do in his remaining 70 days in office. Is he going to take some type of military action? Is he going to release some type of information that could in fact threaten our national security interests?"

Or is he going to take the public on an adventure ride through the swamp?

Would he start a war? I don't know John, would he? You spent four years trying to bounce him into one. How did that go?

[Niall_Quinn]

Here's the person in question explaining the lengths the fake news media will go to to install their candidate.



Forget about the election fraud, disregard whether this guy is a whistleblower or a fantasist. Instead, have a think about why the mainstream media would publish such a transparent lie. Or why Twitter would run the lie repeatedly in its recommended articles panel. Or why even people on this forum would then spread the lie.

Why the need for so many to be lying so blatantly? And if these liars prevail, where does that take us?

The target of these lies has already been suspended from his job. Concerned individuals started a GoFundMe campaign on his behalf. You can guess what happened next. Why is it so important for whistleblowers to be destroyed by the establishment? And why do we see repeatedly the pattern of one swamp corporation collaborating with another to punish whistleblowers across the spectrum?

The questions answer themselves. The nature of the corporations and individuals spreading these lies is laid bare. So desperate. So transparent.

A reminder. Find for yourself the audio recording of the creepy agents who visited this whistleblower. Well worth the listen.

[Letters]

Quote hard to get to the bottom of this one.
He claimed he heard some people say a thing.
Then apparently recanted, according to a couple of sources. But now he's saying he didn't do that.
And even if he did hear a thing - which will just be his word against other people's and I guess he has no evidence for other than him saying it (to be fair, what other evidence could he have?)
It's not enough votes to make a difference anyway

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1721107.html

[Niall_Quinn]

Thank heavens for independent, unbiased journalists and members of the public who are here to assist people who still believe their lying eyes.

The Hopkins story is complex. Far too complex for you, dear reader, to figure out without assistance.

It goes like this. A postal worker claims election fraud occurred at the USPS where he worked, until they suspended him. The Washington Post (and other respectable journals) then claimed he recanted to company officials. Unknown to those company officials, the postal worker recorded them trying to get him to change his story. He then released his own video (and the audio) and clearly stated he does not recant anything and is prepared to go to court and give his evidence.

What can we tell from this story that "Doesn't even matter"?

Well, we now know he "flip-flops". He says clearly that's not the case and has audio to prove it. But the Independent says otherwise. It's one of those classic He-said, They-blatantly-lied dilemmas where you just don't know who to believe. However, the Washington Post and Buzzfeed support the Independent so, if I were you, I'd discount everything the witness has to say. There is nothing to see here. And even if there is, it just doesn't matter because Trump won't win.

So, you see, this isn't about truth or lies, it's about authority and outcome. This isn't some silly game of principles, this is the real world.

It's at times like this we can fall back on the wisdom of somebody who knows how to handle situations like these for a successful outcome.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." -- Joseph Goebbels

I have every confidence in the full might of the establishment to silence this troublesome citizen.

And credit must also go to other, more cooperative, citizens who help the establishment in all its endeavours. The state could not prosper were it not for the army of everyday heroes doing its bidding, day after day.

[GP]

Quote hard to get to the bottom of this one.
He claimed he heard some people say a thing.
Then apparently recanted, according to a couple of sources. But now he's saying he didn't do that.
And even if he did hear a thing - which will just be his word against other people's and I guess he has no evidence for other than him saying it (to be fair, what other evidence could he have?)
It's not enough votes to make a difference anyway

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1721107.html

[Niall_Quinn]

Maccy's pet troll to the rescue

[WMUG]

Why didn't Trump drain the swamp like he did he would?

[Letters]

like he did he would?

[GP]

Typos are funny.

But to answer his question, it's because he built a swamp even Shrek would be proud of.

[Mac76]

Here's the person in question explaining the lengths the fake news media will go to to install their candidate.

Forget about the election fraud, disregard whether this guy is a whistleblower or a fantasist. Instead, have a think about why the mainstream media would publish such a transparent lie. Or why Twitter would run the lie repeatedly in its recommended articles panel.

simple - clickbait - they know people will watch the story = more ad revenue