Sure. But when you've had 50 cases and only won 1, it doesn't build much confidence that the level of evidence is as good as Trump et al are claiming.
Right. But in 2000 it was a genuinely close election which came down to one State where the difference was in the hundreds of votes.
In order for Trump to win this one he's going to have to demonstrate there was widespread fraud in multiple states all of which he lost by a fairly significant margin.
The only one which was close was Georgia, close enough to trigger a by hand recount which didn't reveal any discrepancies.
Trump's team have also paid for recounts in other places which found no issues either.
You've got Barr saying there's no evidence been found of widespread fraud and judges throwing the cases out left, right and centre, so...
My point about ghosts was simply that a lot of people claiming something doesn't make it true.
You've got a POTUS whipping up people to believe that the election was stolen from him so of course a lot of people are coming forward making claims. Ultimately when those claims are being tested in court they're falling flat.