well by booing the sub they were booing him, even if not directly. he must have felt like shit and even shiter the fact he was at fault for the winner. Even if it did get me GW PL PointsOriginally Posted by Niall_Quinn
well by booing the sub they were booing him, even if not directly. he must have felt like shit and even shiter the fact he was at fault for the winner. Even if it did get me GW PL Points
Not really, he could have come on for Theo and everyone would have cheered. Okay to boo him for fucking up on the goal though, useless bastard.
Für eure Sicherheit
That was very uncomfortable watching....but the fans are at the end of their tether.
Asharvin is a talent but needs to be played where he can be effective, behind the striker....he simply does not have the engine to play anywhere else.
Wenger was at fault for the Eboue issue and again today.
Its not even that, its the fact he does not want to be here and don;t give a shit but is still picked to be in the squad. Arshavin is not the same guy we bought 2 years in jan.
No point in criticising the fans. Even RVP was baffled by that decision and was verbal about it. He was pissed because he saw Ox walking off the pitch. Fans were booing when they saw Ox walking as well.
Thats why i said its not intentional but to AA it may have seemed so, so how he played is irrelvant. Had Wenger blamed him for the winner he be finshed off for good.
So Arshavin should be booed because the fans are upset.
Wenger knew the flanks were where Man U were most dangerous and made the right decision to take off Djourou. But bringing on Arshavin was a mistake. Taking off Ox, our most dangerous player was silly.
Arshavin would not have been booed had he been replacing Theo. And had that been the scenario, we'd have had at least a point.
Sort you're head, mate. You're all over the place. The boos weren't directed at Arshavin.!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote