I’m not the one making arguments at all let alone silly ones, I actually stated what the indictment said, which you’ve in no way disputed despite all this “he had every right to contest the election” repetition.
Don’t agree with the indictment? Fine no one expects you to, but the charge wasn’t challenging an election he genuinely felt wasn’t fair. There wasn’t any genuine curiosity over whether he actually won or not, he tried to persuade states to award their electoral points to him.
But if you think I’m uninformed, and I should feel silly. From you…I’ll take the compliment.