depends what we want from a new striker, do we want someone to be first choice which might mean changing the way we play. which could be risky as the games get more and more important or do we want a striker like solskjaer someone who can come off the bench and nick a goal. Get in behind the defences etc.
We want someone to take over from Giroud not to warm the bench.
somebody put something in my milk
He's supposedly got a £32m buy out clause.Originally Posted by Blink 1nce Quince 2wice
Giroud has been great but not enough to warrant an automatic starting place. We shouldn't sign someone to be second choice, we should sign someone to compete with him for the first team place. Competition for places is a good thing and it gives us much more options.
We're in 3 competitions still anyway so they would both get plenty of games.
That's how Alteltico operates IMO, they always put a sell clause in their player's contract.
somebody put something in my milk
That's how everyone in Spain operates...
Yeah that's how they operates though some of the buy out clause are ridicolously high.
somebody put something in my milk
If only Liverpool had operated that way
Apparently Wenger got it wrong, Suarez get out clause is £40,000,002.00 not £40,000,001.00If only Liverpool had operated that way
somebody put something in my milk
No chance of Costa, Athletico are joint top of the league and still in the CL, they won't sell him.
Costa has scored tonight and missed a penalty, reminds me of Hulk to be honest.
Posting Permissions
