Honest Frank the Muppet and other Chavs sh!t

[GP]

I'm fairly sure this is the most wrong post I've read on GW. If it isn't the most wrong, it is almost certainly in the Top 1.

Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

lol yeah.

WUMing from an account created for the sole purpose of WUMing is no surprise though.

[Syn]

Couldn't stop laughing after the first paragraph.

[gooners]

The gw royalty gang has assembled have they?

And they they are going preach from their moral high ground.

Then again this convo has been had before. But carry on


Edit: there used to be fits of laughter on this board from the very same folks when chelsea announced some years back that the were looking to break even.

Some or most were looking forward to clubs like chelsea imploding -- but as it turns out, they are here to stay.

Now that clubs like chelsea - whom we all want to play within socalled financial rules - are showing signs ot doing just that, i see the halfbaked moral sentiments still persist and wont go away.

I can understand if this discourse was with a non-football fan; then i could comprehend their moral outrage.

Hypocrites, much?

[IBK]

The gw royalty gang has assembled have they?

And they they are going preach from their moral high ground.

Then again this convo has been had before. But carry on


Edit: there used to be fits of laughter on this board from the very same folks when chelsea announced some years back that the were looking to break even.

Some or most were looking forward to clubs like chelsea imploding -- but as it turns out, they are here to stay.

Now that clubs like chelsea - whom we all want to play within socalled financial rules - are showing signs ot doing just that, i see the halfbaked moral sentiments still persist and wont go away.

I can understand if this discourse was with a non-football fan; then i could comprehend their moral outrage.

Hypocrites, much?

I'll take the imploding bit - and unfortunately that hasn't happened. But applauding how new money has become legitimised is a bit shit.

[gooners]

In the scope of football, no it isn't.

[Xhaka Can’t]

The gw royalty gang has assembled have they?

And they they are going preach from their moral high ground.

Then again this convo has been had before. But carry on


Edit: there used to be fits of laughter on this board from the very same folks when chelsea announced some years back that the were looking to break even.

Some or most were looking forward to clubs like chelsea imploding -- but as it turns out, they are here to stay.

Now that clubs like chelsea - whom we all want to play within socalled financial rules - are showing signs ot doing just that, i see the halfbaked moral sentiments still persist and wont go away.

I can understand if this discourse was with a non-football fan; then i could comprehend their moral outrage.

Hypocrites, much?

This reminds me of 1984 when Frankie Goes to Hollywood were No. 1 and 2 in the charts.

I would regularly get drunk on lukewarm cider in a cold field.

Good times.

Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

[GP]

Good answer.

[Cripps_orig]

In the scope of football, no it isn't.

Not really football though is it?

Being successful through someones elses money

Its like me winning the lottery and saying i worked hard for it

[Letters]

In the scope of football, no it isn't.

In the scope of business, no it isn't.
But in football, which used to be a sport - maybe you're too young to remember that, it stinks.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Not really football though is it?

Being successful through someones elses money

Its like me winning the lottery and saying i worked hard for it

Pretty much.