User Tag List

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: Right to go after Henry?

  1. #1
    Member Japan Shaking All Over's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tokyo<Japan - Wandsworth>London
    Posts
    5,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Right to go after Henry?

    Loan for 2 months. . .no brainer IMO

    Would be better off the bench than Chamakh especially if he fucks off in January!

    Park should also be given a chance but Henry will add that muxh needed experience come a traditionall difficult time of year for us. . .

    Still need to look hard at January transfer long term targets tho

  2. #2
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    3,747
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stocking full of Chamakh View Post
    Loan for 2 months. . .no brainer IMO

    Would be better off the bench than Chamakh especially if he fucks off in January!

    Park should also be given a chance but Henry will add that muxh needed experience come a traditionall difficult time of year for us. . .

    Still need to look hard at January transfer long term targets tho
    nothing to lose IMO. But I agree that AW needs to be looking long term. When you see how other high profile players have made an instant impact in the EPL, and how many players he has persevered with have failed to reach their potential his policy of not 'killing' his existing players needs to be revised here. Not doing so may well cost us CL football and RVP.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  3. #3
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    37,629
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Could maybe do a job short term. Far less depressing option than Chammakh or Arshavin.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No we need someone who can play til the end of the season at least plus Henry is a bit shit these days.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A washed up, slow, shit Henry or Chamakh & Arshavin. Not a difficult choice.

    It's fucking embarrassing that a club of our size and income is even considering such a move. We should be buying quality players in their prime.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1) I prefer to remember Henry as he was, the top class player who produced some amazing moments and scored a hatful of goals, coming back now when he's past his best will only taint this

    2) Once again this is Wenger being cheap as he almost always is, he wants to stick with nobodies like Chamakh and bring in cheap short term cover rather than buying quality long term solution, we'll never build a top quality team if we stick with players who don't deliver and keep getting cheap quick fixes like Squillaci. We need a manager who is focussed on building a team not saving money to make sure he doesn't risk his 6 million a year salary.

  7. #7
    MOe Marc Overmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    31,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Henry is well past it but it's better than nothing at all. Just another option to have.

  8. #8
    Member Kaiser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    352
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As long as his arrival is complemented by someone like Podolski coming in. Then it'd work.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,731
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Agreed, if Henry is the only striker coming in to compensate for Gervinho and Chamakh leaving for the ACON, then that is not good enough. There are question marks over whether he can still hack it at the top level anyway, so we'd be taking a big risk by relying on him to provide cover for RVP, even if it is for just a few months. Moreover, we should be looking at long term targets anyway, not just someone to fill in in the short term. Because even when Chamakh comes back, it is manifest that he is nowhere near good enough, and this leaves us extremely short up front.

    Again, Wenger is looking to get the cheapest option in, rather than focusing on long term needs. We should get a good quality striker in January on a long-term deal, who can provide competition for RVP, even if such a player will cost a bit. Penny pinching has got us nowhere over the last 5 years, it's time to focus on quality, not simply price.

  10. #10
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't stick this one on Wenger yet. I think he was asked a question by the press and just responded. I don't think he's given it any serious thought yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •