User Tag List

Page 11 of 36 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 352

Thread: Gay marriage

  1. #101
    Member Fats's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All I'll say is this: God does not exist. Marriage in his name or in the view of the church is pointless.

    This guy who is against gay marrige/civil partnership is a moron as he belives in a superior being that does not exist.

    Also in the bible is states:If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads

    Religeon is an evil thing if it demands death on an individual because of what they are.

  2. #102
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    37,363
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fats View Post
    All I'll say is this: God does not exist.
    Well that's thousands of years of theological debate resolved. Thanks for that.

  3. #103
    Member Master Splinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    24,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters View Post
    Well that's thousands of years of theological debate resolved. Thanks for that.
    Godette exists though.

  4. #104
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    37,363
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's who I'm waiting for...

  5. #105
    Member Master Splinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    24,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #106
    Member WMUG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,943
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    http://fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=86364

    NQ

    Also Letters, your argument works both ways. If it's just a difference in the words used, then surely there's no harm in changing what civil partnerships are called on gender grounds? If it makes no legal difference but some people feel strongly about it, surely just throw them a bone and be done with it?

    (I actually think it's more significant that that, but yeah).
    You used to be everything to me
    Now you're tired of fighting

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Where's my username gone? View Post
    http://fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=86364

    NQ

    Also Letters, your argument works both ways. If it's just a difference in the words used, then surely there's no harm in changing what civil partnerships are called on gender grounds? If it makes no legal difference but some people feel strongly about it, surely just throw them a bone and be done with it?

    (I actually think it's more significant that that, but yeah).
    I dont get it

    Whos goonerboy? Is he a fag?

  8. #108
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Where's my username gone? View Post
    http://fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=86364

    NQ

    Also Letters, your argument works both ways. If it's just a difference in the words used, then surely there's no harm in changing what civil partnerships are called on gender grounds? If it makes no legal difference but some people feel strongly about it, surely just throw them a bone and be done with it?

    (I actually think it's more significant that that, but yeah).
    I dont get it

    Whos goonerboy? Is he a fag?

  9. #109
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Where's my username gone? View Post
    http://fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=86364

    NQ

    Also Letters, your argument works both ways. If it's just a difference in the words used, then surely there's no harm in changing what civil partnerships are called on gender grounds? If it makes no legal difference but some people feel strongly about it, surely just throw them a bone and be done with it?

    (I actually think it's more significant that that, but yeah).
    What's that place? Some sort of a fag hangout?
    Für eure Sicherheit

  10. #110
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    37,363
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Where's my username gone? View Post
    Also Letters, your argument works both ways. If it's just a difference in the words used, then surely there's no harm in changing what civil partnerships are called on gender grounds? If it makes no legal difference but some people feel strongly about it, surely just throw them a bone and be done with it?
    Well fine but other people feel strongly the other way. Why not throw them a bone, leave it as it is and everyone has the same rights, the semantics of marriage remains the same and no-one of religious persuasion gets offended. I know you don't care whether they get offended or not but as you said the argument works both ways. Just don't pretend that this debate is about equality because it isn't. Gay couples already (in law at least) have equality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •