That was one part of the argument and I actually bought the sovereignty argument, for a while.
Then I realised that we were already sovereign, that's why to leave the EU we only had to write a letter, not go to war.
To say there is zero argument to remain is as stupid and simplistic as saying there was zero argument to leave. The EU is a club, one we chose to join. There is a certain cost of joining and certain drawbacks, there are certain benefits. Whether the benefits are worth the drawbacks and cost are what the debate was about - or should have been. Instead it was about how much more money we'd have to spend on the NHS when we leave (lie) and how we'd be able to control immigration (probable lie) and how the sky would fall in if we leave (lie).
There was no intelligent debate going on.
So that's a stupid reason to make a decision about a complicated topic. And if they voted Remain because they thought the economy would completely collapse if we left that that was a stupid reason too.And if some people did vote for independence because they "hate the frogs", so what?
Why do you keep pretending that complicated arguments are simple?