I understand all those words, but not in that order.Originally Posted by McNamara That Ghost...
Last vote was whether MPs take control of the process rather than the government, which has MP's.
Have literally no idea what the difference is
Or what then being “in control” means.
So now they’ve voted for a delay.
Now what?!
Hopefully some pub team country in the EU is the only one to veto it.
Delay?
What happens?
I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
I’ll judge May at the end of the Brexit
I'm judging her now and she's a cunt.
NOTE: The location of this post has been moved and the thread title (which was previously Wenger is Leaving) has been manipulated by a notorious pro-Wenger moderator. What was previously a message that contained no profanity and made a comment on a real life event has now been manipulated by a deliberately provocative title. An old and crude propaganda and censorship technique.
Cross party cuntditry.
They’re all cunts.
All self serving.
All cunts.
I’m a remainer, but we should be going out on 29th.
And Farage, Cameron, Johnson, May, Corbyn, and their cronies should all be imprisoned for it.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
Meh. I'm leaning towards "people's vote". I know the counter argument is "we already had that".
Well, yes, we did. But that was a few years ago now, the result was close and a lot has happened since then.
If there are indications that we would get a different result now then we should have a do-over.
And this time what Leave means should be made clear. At the time there was no plan from anyone about what leaving looked like.
It was a stupid referendum which forced the population to make a binary choice on an issue which is much more complicated than that.
No we didn't. The first referendum just said 'Do you want what we've got or something else'
It didn't define what that something else was.
Any new referendum would just be 'Is this what you wanted'
Seeing as where we are is nothing like what was promised, it would be undemocratic not to put this back to the people.
NOTE: The location of this post has been moved and the thread title (which was previously Wenger is Leaving) has been manipulated by a notorious pro-Wenger moderator. What was previously a message that contained no profanity and made a comment on a real life event has now been manipulated by a deliberately provocative title. An old and crude propaganda and censorship technique.
The something else was leaving the EU.
What that meant in detail was undefined, but the mandate to leave the EU was clear. Close, but clear.
So I don't agree that either no deal or May's deal is undemocratic. People could bleat about "that isn't what I meant" but they voted for something else without any binding promise of what that meant.
They can't just now rescind Article 50 without asking "the people" again.
But I don't know what the question should be. I'm not in favour of a 3 way vote (Remain, The Deal or No Deal), that would just split the vote further.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote