The Wish They Were All Dead Tory Cunt Thread

[McNamara That Ghost...]

Ah the BBC have posted the timetable helpfully:

12:00 GMT: Prime Minister's Questions
By 14:00: MPs take control of the Commons to debate the process of indicative votes
By 15:00: MPs vote on the procedure for indicative votes
15:15: The Speaker announces which Brexit proposals he has chosen to be debated and voted on, and the debate begins
19:00: MPs vote with paper and pen for their preferences
19:30: Debate on statutory instrument (SI) bringing Brexit delay into law
21:00: Vote on SI
21:15:The Speaker announces the results of the indicative votes - though he could announce them earlier during SI debate

[Letters]

Honestly. Arguing with people on the internet is so tiresome.
I said to someone (someone I don't know, a FB friend of a FB friend) that there's good evidence that were there a Referendum now the result may well be different.
Someone asked me for evidence so I presented it ( https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47693645 )
Some else then replied:

"you forgot to include some of the rationale e.g. In part, this is because Leave voters are a little less likely to say they would vote the same way again (82%), than Remain voters are (86%) So the polls are, as per usual, not quite what they purport and nowhere near 'evidence'."



Wait. So...
This isn't evidence because more people who voted Leave would vote differently now than people who voted Remain.



That is literally the definition of people changing their mind.

[Letters]

Pie

[McNamara That Ghost...]

MP's have a larger amount voting for indicative votes.

I don't know why we needed that vote again.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

Bercow laying the smack down again.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

The amendments Bercow has selected:

MPs approve the business motion by 331 to 287, and will now start the main debate on Brexit options.

Speaker John Bercow announces that he has selected the following eight choices:

No Deal (B) – John Baron (Conservative)

Agrees to leave the EU on 12 April without a deal.

Common market 2.0 (D) – Nick Boles (Conservative)

Government joins the European Economic Area (EEA) through the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), and negotiates a temporary customs union until alternative arrangements can be found.

EFTA and EEA (H) – George Eustice (Conservative)

Remains in the European Economic Area (EEA), and applies to re-join the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).

Declines to form a customs union but seeks “agreement on new protocols relating to the Northern Ireland border and agri-food trade”.

Customs union (J) – Ken Clarke (Conservative)

Enshrine the objective to form a customs union in primary legislation.

Labour’s alternative plan (K) – Jeremy Corbyn

Negotiate changes to the withdrawal agreement and the political declaration to secure Labour’s position, and pass these objectives into law.

Revocation to avoid no deal (L) – Joanna Cherry (SNP)

If the Withdrawal (Agreement) Bill has not been passed before exit day, the government will ask MPs to approve no deal. If this does not pass, the government will revoke Article 50.

Confirmatory public vote (M) – Margaret Beckett (Labour)

Government cannot implement or ratify the withdrawal agreement and the political declaration unless and until they have been approved in a referendum.

Contingent preferential arrangements (O) – Marcus Fysh (Conservative)

Malthouse Plan B: The UK makes its budgetary contributions to the EU to the end of 2020 and agrees with the EU a period of two years in which UK goods have full access to the EU.

[Letters]

I bet the fuckers vote against a second referendum.
It’s been 3 years since the referendum, there are indications that opinions have changed since.
May was allowed to have effectively the same vote within a week or two, we aren’t allowed to vote again on an issue 3 years after the original one and when so much has happened since.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

They definitely won't, not given the suggestion comes from a Labour MP.

May has told the 1922 committee she won't be there to lead the next phase of negotiations. Given that involves leading presumably does that mean it could be some time?

[Globalgunner]

I bet the fuckers vote against a second referendum.
It’s been 3 years since the referendum, there are indications that opinions have changed since.
May was allowed to have effectively the same vote within a week or two, we aren’t allowed to vote again on an issue 3 years after the original one and when so much has happened since.

When politicians want something so bad as this. Beware! It cant be good for the masses. They are scared stiff of a second referendum, its so obvious.

[McNamara That Ghost...]

Chamber is filling up so it can't be long before we get some results.