I'm suggesting the great British public are silly for voting at all. Your argument is people are too stupid or uninformed to vote, which is different to my argument that it's stupid to vote for something that doesn't represent you. You argument ultimately advocates technocratic authoritarianism, mine advocates self determination and liberty. Opposite ends of the spectrum.
My point would be that if the majority voted for the Tories (which is not the case but the system is rigged) then the theoretical majority must want and approve of inequality and injustice and misrepresentation and general white collar criminality. Perhaps they tolerate these things because they perceive some sort of personal payoff. Or else they are afraid of the other choice that has been chosen for them and are all but ignoring the harm inherent in a Tory victory to prevent the harm they perceive in a Labour victory. It's a bit like jumping overboard and into the mouth of a waiting shark just before the boat hits the rocks. It's the fact you boarded the boat that's the real problem, not the seemingly hopeless choices you are left with thereafter. The argument that everyone else is on the boat anyway is hardly a consolation, is it?
Wouldn't it be a lot more constructive and certainly funnier if everyone watched from the shore? But of course the politicians will tell you the shore is the worst place to be because chaos reigns there, unlike on their doomed boat in shark infested waters where you'll be safe.
Madness. Only thing to do is wait it out until a majority cops on. In the meantime though, there's no conceivable benefit to letting a kraut or a frog remote control the ship. You can't even throttle the captain and grab the wheel in that instance, it wouldn't make any difference.