User Tag List

Page 880 of 1380 FirstFirst ... 380780830870878879880881882890930980 ... LastLast
Results 8,791 to 8,800 of 13800

Thread: Random Arsenal Shit (When it's not worth starting a thread)

  1. #8791
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters View Post
    I think Giroud's was intentional...he'll never do it again though
    I don't think that kind of goal can be intentional, he reached out for it but there's no way he reached it and was aiming for the goal, he just caught it and it went in it wasn't planned that way.

    With all due respect to him, he's no Zidane and even if someone like Zidane did it you'd have to question whether he meant it.

  2. #8792
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    37,625
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Believe at the time other players were saying he'd done it or tried it in training, I think he meant it. Like Nayim from the half way line "meant it". Never do it again though.

  3. #8793
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's an instinctive reaction. Happens in football all the time. He had no time to think about it, just react. Giroud is really good at that. A fluke but intentional if that makes sense.

  4. #8794
    MOe Marc Overmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    31,229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The ball was behind him and he did what he he could to send it towards goal. A one in a million effort but definitely intentional.

    One thing I like about Giroud is that he has the audacity to try things most players wouldn’t, his thought process is completely different. You could argue that’s also a flaw but he has done some spectacular things for us, acrobatic goals, flicks and clever crosses to combine for goals, awkward headers etc. He’s not a great goalscorer but more a scorer of great goals.

  5. #8795
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He's a great plan B. Someone to bring on to change the game.

    As a plan A. No thanks.

  6. #8796
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,880
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Quote Originally Posted by Vieira View Post
    He's a great plan B. Someone to bring on to change the game.

    As a plan A. No thanks.
    What he said.

  7. #8797
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65,908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I preferred the build up to the actual goal. The goal was a great piece of improvisation, undoubtedly a deliberate attempt at a 1 in 100 chance. But the movement from back to front at pace and with rapid, accurate passing, that was fun to watch. We used to do that all the time. And goes to show we could still do it if a certain bloke was so inclined.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  8. #8798
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vieira View Post
    He's a great plan B. Someone to bring on to change the game.

    As a plan A. No thanks.
    He’s a good player so long as he’s being used properly. Plan A, Plan B….it makes no difference if being used incorrectly. Seen plenty of occasions where Wenger has brought Giroud on for the wrong sort of game as seen against Watford recently. He’s the sort of player that needs better coaching and needs to a certain set up around him because he’s the sort of striker that needs service. He has limitations but how we doesn’t help him at all. He’s slow but that scorpion kick was scored on a counter so it’s possible get more out of him in those sort of situations instead of always trying to lump the ball up to him.

    To me, his biggest flaws are that he never plays on the half turn or attempts to shimmy his way to a goal scoring opportunity when close to goal. He’ll always play a flick to the side or back in the direction he’s facing with his first touch. It’s as if we work the ball to get into a dangerous area and he just plays it back out of the danger area. Also, he’s not moving around enough to link up play with the players around him. Way too static and far too much time wrestling defenders back to only receive the ball and lose it with a flick or play it back out of the area he’s fighting to gain ground on. It’s senseless.

    Would love to see Giroud played with Lacazette, Welbeck or Theo up front. He needs a complimentary partner and someone else to work off to buy him more time when in the box. God knows why we have’t tried this especially since we’re now playing 3-4-3. That can easily turn into a 3-5-2.

  9. #8799
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    65,908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vieira View Post
    He's a great plan B. Someone to bring on to change the game.

    As a plan A. No thanks.
    He's a good squad striker. Trouble at this place is it's either/ or. Wenger has no sensible rotation or substitution policies. And we don't play to strengths. Why can't we play with 2 strikers against some opponents, for example? Have to say Bif has managed to carve himself out a surprisingly significant profile, especially at International level, while playing for a club on the decline and, more recently, being benched at club level. And he hasn't complained about it, he just gets on. Second tier, then again so are a lot of so-called top tier hype merchants, but a good pro.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  10. #8800
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    He's a good squad striker. Trouble at this place is it's either/ or. Wenger has no sensible rotation or substitution policies. And we don't play to strengths. Why can't we play with 2 strikers against some opponents, for example? Have to say Bif has managed to carve himself out a surprisingly significant profile, especially at International level, while playing for a club on the decline and, more recently, being benched at club level. And he hasn't complained about it, he just gets on. Second tier, then again so are a lot of so-called top tier hype merchants, but a good pro.
    Exactly. I can’t make any sense of it. Giroud’s best moments come when he’s combining with another player with quick passes. Look at the overhead kick he scored the other day or that goal he set up for Jack. When isolated, Giroud is pants. Why not look to get him combining with more players instead of starting him up front as a solo striker and being isolated for most of the game?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •