Pat Robertson obviously thinks so.
Where do you stand on this issue?
Personally I think that two people who love each other and decide to commit should have the same rights and obligations regardless of the make up of the couple, assuming both are human.
ThisOriginally Posted by GB.
need to keep those poor divorce lawyers from going out of business so yeah knock themselves out
Society is now one polished horde
Formed by two mighty tribes, the bores and the bored.
"After all, it was the Gunners’ goalkeeper who started the move that culminated in Thomas’ crowning glory. It was Lukic who, in injury time, decided to throw the ball out to Lee Dixon rather than lump it long..."
Outlaw marriage; everything is solved.
Eccentric gays are a bit disgusting tbh.
Normal gays are fine though, there is a lad in the office who is a homo but is just one of the lads really. Drinks beer, talks football, curses and farts.
No reason why they shouldn't have the same rights and obligations tbf. I'm sure a committed gay couple could give a better upbringing to a child than many of the immature and squabbling hetrosexual couples out there.
Innit.
I don't mind people being gay so long as they don't stick it down my throat
PS: No, we're not doomed and I don't have any problem with gay unions and equal rights and all that but it doesn't sit well with me calling it marriage, to me that is by definition a union between a man and a woman. I guess that definition could change but that's how I feel about it.
That is the only correct stance.
Equal rights for them dirty bum drillers.
I must admit though, I'd be gutted if my kid turned out to be gay.
As long as they keep it behind closed doors and don't flaunt that shit around, keep their diseases to themselves and the sick faggot fucks element forgoes grooming confused kids, fine, why not, let them play house.
Für eure Sicherheit
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote