Originally Posted by
Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
I did give him the benefit of the doubt, what I did was voice my reservations about his competence. I acknowledged that he really was the only hope we had for change.
The reason we assume Gazidis is powerless is because of Kroenke and yet he was here two years before Kroenke.
I'm simply saying it's not inconceivable a chief executive with more clout might have more power over Wenger. Like I've said Wenger has cultivated a relationship with Kroenke, one that Gazidis clearly does not have.
And I don't think it's unfair to at the very least speculate that a man who clearly was prepared to humiliate himself in the way Gazidis has to keep his very nice pay packet might not be awfully good at his job. Whether you think he should have gone or not, if Gazidis is that good at his job hed surely think I can actually get another one where I actually make changes.
It strikes me that it's easier for him to do a 180 and pretend like he never said what he did. Spin merchant basically.