The second peak.
We had the first peak, and that was scary.
But now, ooooooh, we have the second peak.
Be very scared. More than you were scared the first time around.
The SECOND peak dudes.
We have nothing to fear but the SECOND PEAK!
Für eure Sicherheit
So finally, we now hear the virus came out of a Chinese lab. Rather than the wet markets. Which is not an excuse for the disgusting wet markets.
Look into it.
Für eure Sicherheit
Consider it looked into
https://www.newscientist.com/term/coronavirus-come-lab/
The VERY first sentence of that article:
"No, this virus isn’t a bioweapon."
Which means everything thereafter is total bullshit.
Nobody said it was a bioweapon. The latest evidence suggest the probability of it coming out of a Chinese lab is many time greater than it coming out of the wet markets, which didn't even sell the bat in question.
And there's more. But we need to slowly acclimatise the normies to reality before we spring that on them.
Für eure Sicherheit
You aren't wrong. That's what they were saying. Minus any evidence on their part. Not even a shred. It's amazing how little we know about the virus at the centre of this crisis. If this was a financial vehicle we'd have an authoritative page on Wikipedia by now.
They are trying very very hard to learn northing. Because they already have all the useful answers. But it's not the right time to sell them yet.
When the time comes, check who ultimately profits from the magic remedy.
The "virus" (no virus has been identified at this time) is real. The response is 100% manufactured and pre-planned. At least roughly. Seems to me they had to jump on this because it came out of the blue.
Für eure Sicherheit
From the article:
However, rumours on social media suggest that the outbreak was human-made. Some say the virus leaked from a Chinese lab studying coronaviruses. Others suggest the virus was engineered to spread among humans.
Even the most secure laboratories do sometimes have accidents, and a human-engineered pandemic has been identified as a possible risk to our civilisation, but there is no good evidence that either has happened.
Many similar viruses are found in wild bats, and it seems likely that is the origin of this one, probably via an intermediate host. Similarly, we know that both SARS and MERS came from bats, so there is no reason to invoke a laboratory accident.
Researchers led by Shan-Lu Liu at the Ohio State University say there is “no credible evidence” of genetic engineering (Emerging Microbes & Infections, doi.org/dpvw). The virus’s genome has been sequenced, and if it had been altered, we would expect to see signs of inserted gene sequences. But we now know the points that differ from bat viruses are scattered in a fairly random way, just as they would be if the new virus had evolved naturally.
Or is the suggestion you're alluding to that the lab was doing research on a new natural strain of the virus and escaped from there?