NOTE: The location of this post has been moved and the thread title (which was previously Wenger is Leaving) has been manipulated by a notorious pro-Wenger moderator. What was previously a message that contained no profanity and made a comment on a real life event has now been manipulated by a deliberately provocative title. An old and crude propaganda and censorship technique.
Or set up a store on Amazon to cash in.
Sounds like we have 10 days where the virus won't be infectious though, so that's a plus.
This is a classic example of a "law" that should just be ignored by everyone, thus rendering it void. But you just know there will be arseholes out there calling the cops every 5 minutes, running around with their phones snapping evidence so they get extra citizen points. Anyone grasses me up like that and I'll put their teeth through the back of their skull.
Für eure Sicherheit
Just as everything was sort of going back to something resembling normal. The queues are gone at the supermarket, mostly, now that people have figured out it's not the apocalypse and supplies will hold up. The social distancing nonsense has all but disappeared. And people who choose to wear masks, a few of them, have their masks. We've seen no dead littering the streets.
Now we're back to the days of leeches and bloodletting. They didn't get their second wave, but they can't let go of this pandemic they are so infatuated with.
Für eure Sicherheit
Don't worry. The BBC's got your back, bro
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53392148
When have you ever known government to give up new powers? These people don't care about the economy. Power corrupts. They are the 1% they will be fine as long as they get to satiate their megalomaniacy.
Except I don't want to either way a face covering or pay £100, that "solution" has me submitting to both.
I used to call NQ a tin foil hat wearer but it turns out he was the only one around here with his eyes open actually thinking. I hope one day you'll see the truth too, but I wouldn't count on it.
Do you mean our government or governments generally? Because in some countries the lockdown was far more strictly enforced than it was here.
You literally had to fill out a form to explain why you were outside in I think Spain and Italy.
That is no longer the case.
So then.
And over here many of the restrictions initially put in place have now been lifted. So then too.
Quite often in times of national crisis measures are put in place in the short term and lifted once the crisis has passed.
Your and NQ's problem, if I may, is that you confuse "eyes open actually thinking" with "getting your information from other sources other than MSM".I used to call NQ a tin foil hat wearer but it turns out he was the only one around here with his eyes open actually thinking. I hope one day you'll see the truth too, but I wouldn't count on it.
You happen to have come to believe those sources are more reliable than MSM. Well, fine. But that is just your opinion.
Just because some bloke online says a thing, and the bloke isn't employed by a maintream organisation, that doesn't make what he says accurate.
If anything the reverse may be true because there's no scrutiny on some bloke, anyone can set up a YouTube channel and say pretty much anything.
Which doesn't mean the MSM sources don't have their biases, of course they do. But so do all of us, including some bloke on YouTube.
Governments in general.
Of course they don't keep every draconian measure, even the lemmings would see that. Its classic negotiating, they start off with something totally unreasonable, then lift some of those restrictions while the sheep celebrate being let back out, they ignore the infringements that remain.
No, I believe nothing and question everything. I consider who's saying it, why they're saying it and their bias for saying it. What I will say though is the MSM has zero credibility which has been shown time and time again.Your and NQ's problem, if I may, is that you confuse "eyes open actually thinking" with "getting your information from other sources other than MSM".
You happen to have come to believe those sources are more reliable than MSM. Well, fine. But that is just your opinion.
Just because some bloke online says a thing, and the bloke isn't employed by a maintream organisation, that doesn't make what he says accurate.
If anything the reverse may be true because there's no scrutiny on some bloke, anyone can set up a YouTube channel and say pretty much anything.
Which doesn't mean the MSM sources don't have their biases, of course they do. But so do all of us, including some bloke on YouTube.