Coronavirus Pandemic

[Niall_Quinn]

Ooh, getting amgry?

I've never written a single word on here using the terms race hate, class hate or gender hate, neither have i said anything that could be classed as particularly left-wing, the trouble is people like you are intentionally always trying to drag the mainstream towards the right, thereby enabling you to describe centreground views as 'lefty'

Oh yeah, lots of people are getting angry - you can bank on that.

Oh dear, did I make false claims about you? Well sorry about that.

But guess what. You are an extremist race hating, woman hating, trans hating piece of shit.

Oh dear, did I make false claims about you? Well sorry about that.

But guess what. You are an extremist race hating, woman hating, trans hating piece of shit.

Oh dear, did I make false claims about you? Well sorry about that.

But guess what. You are an extremist race hating, woman hating, trans hating piece of shit.

And so on.

At least have the balls to back up your slander, from time to time. Twice before I've asked you to do it. It's not an unreasonable request, considering I'm the one being slandered. But here we are, third time around and you won't touch the request because you won't find anything I've ever said that supports your claim. Not that I think you are being serious. I think you are just trying to appeal to other simple minded people on this forum.

Meanwhile, weren't you one of those people sympathetic to the race baiting BLM? Maybe the slander I've levelled at you for effect is not so far from the mark.

[Niall_Quinn]

NQ sixth sense.
"I see lefties"

Only the normal senses - mainly smell.

You've encountered the same shit from these muppets in your futile debates with them. So you already know what I'm talking about.

[Xhaka Can’t]

We'll never know what happened? Despite the stream of evidence coming out every day? Well I guess we won't know if we studiously ignore that evidence. What we do know though, is the TDS establishment ran a 3 year hoax. That much is established. The corrupt gang that pursued the Trump campaign and then Trump himself came up with zero. Nothing. Despite the willingness to bend, twist and distort every piece of information. We have it all, in their own words. You see, this is why it has become impossible to have a useful discussion with leftists. Their brains are done in. You can push their face into something and ask if they see it. No, they'll say. Nothing there.

Never said you argued against they idea of corruption. What I said was that's what I talk about, and you then (like so many with no argument) brush it all off as "conspiracy theory".

Well go on - which bits of "evidence" (you mean the latest report from the WHO, maybe?) don't fit my narrative? And what narrative might that be? That the left has gone insane? That governors, mayors and civic leaders of lefty controlled cities are dragging their communities into the sewer? That greedy bastards are trying to cash in on the CHINESE virus? That Gates is a crook? Which bit triggers you most?

No nuance? LOL. It's beyond belief. No nuance

You mean I can't see the grey areas in shitty criminals being held up as martyrs by marxists posing as civil rights activists? Bloke was a shitty criminal. I called him a shitty criminal. How would you like that to be rephrased to fondle your sensibilities?

Am I missing the "nuance" in the new science? Where almost everything we used to know about health has been reversed? And where hopelessly inaccurate fear porn is pumped night and day? And where personal liberties have been shat upon? Should I be setting up a committee so we can discuss these things over tea? Is it wrong to call out the corrupt, flip-flopping cunts whose incompetence has ruined global economies and rolled back decades or centuries of hard won rights?

Or is it the new genders? We go from science, biology, physical evidence - to suddenly having 200 genders and instant gender swapping. And perverts stalking schools teaching kids how to bang each other up the shitter? Yeah, yeah, I've missed all the subtlety of this insanity.

Or busting up the family. Shutting down religion. Defunding the police. Running overtly racist campaigns for "equality". Running a dementia patient for office. Telling us all we'll need to be tracked, traced and carry "your papers please!" so we can do the things we used to do freely just a few months ago? I guess I'm overreacting?

Or the drugs that actually work as opposed to fantasy vaccines?

Or the censorship and cancel culture?

Nuance?

You people have jumped off the deep end and into the la-la abyss of unimaginable insanity. And you want ME to meet you halfway down so we can talk about it?

LOL

Fuck off. You made your bed and don't go blaming me for the way it's made. As I said, I'm not the one making up fantasy stories about Russians. I'm not the one shitting on science. I'm not the one perverting kids. That's you and your lot. So own it, look in a mirror and don't worry about trying to reflect your nonsense on me.

Wear a mask and shut up? Isn't that your demand? Well sorry. I won't shut up because I live here too and I'm not up for the place turning into a looney bin just so scared people can virtue signal their compliance.

Nope sorry. Don't like it? Don't read it.

Holy fuck!

Next time, cut the pill in half.

[Letters]

Like talking to a brick wall.

Right back atcha.
Your lack of self awareness is astonishing.

One more time. The sources YOU consider to be authoritative, factual and truthful have the BIGGEST and LONGEST track record of telling catastrophic lies that have killed millions of people.

The example you gave before was the infamous dossier about the WMDs.
You are acting like The Sun wrote the dossier, published it with their
“HE’S GOT ‘EM, LET’S GET HIM”
Headline and Blair declared war because of it.

The actual sequence of events was the Government wrote the dossier and released it to the press.
Blair took us to war because of the dossier.
The admittedly unhelpful and inflammatory headlines around it may have created some public support for military action but they weren’t the reason for Blair’s actions. And The Sun and The Star are not exactly my go to sources of truth.

The MSM simply reported on what the dossier said.
You could argue that they should have examined the truth of the dossier’s claims which is fairly reasonable but some of the claims were unsourced and when doubts about the dossier came to light they reported that too.

Your sources are bad. The ones you’ve posted here are all conspiracy theory nuts who spout things which are laughably easy to debunk. You have a clear pattern of disregarding any evidence which doesn’t confirm your worldview. Several others have picked you up on this. It’s the mindset of a conspiracy theorist.
Most of then wild claims in your rant at Gary are demonstrably false.

Oh, and the Covid comment was a joke, you humourless berk.

[Niall_Quinn]

Holy fuck!

Next time, cut the pill in half.

Slink away. Expected.

[Niall_Quinn]

Right back atcha.
Your lack of self awareness is astonishing.



The example you gave before was the infamous dossier about the WMDs.
You are acting like The Sun wrote the dossier, published it with their
“HE’S GOT ‘EM, LET’S GET HIM”
Headline and Blair declared war because of it.

The actual sequence of events was the Government wrote the dossier and released it to the press.
Blair took us to war because of the dossier.
The admittedly unhelpful and inflammatory headlines around it may have created some public support for military action but they weren’t the reason for Blair’s actions. And The Sun and The Star are not exactly my go to sources of truth.

The MSM simply reported on what the dossier said.
You could argue that they should have examined the truth of the dossier’s claims which is fairly reasonable but some of the claims were unsourced and when doubts about the dossier came to light they reported that too.

Your sources are bad. The ones you’ve posted here are all conspiracy theory nuts who spout things which are laughably easy to debunk. You have a clear pattern of disregarding any evidence which doesn’t confirm your worldview. Several others have picked you up on this. It’s the mindset of a conspiracy theorist.
Most of then wild claims in your rant at Gary are demonstrably false.

Oh, and the Covid comment was a joke, you humourless berk.

Now that's just very, very strange. I kind of figured you didn't want me dead. I mean we've had our differences and all, but WTF? What is your strategy in trying to paint me as taking that comment seriously? Just interested to know.

[Niall_Quinn]

Right back atcha.
Your lack of self awareness is astonishing.



The example you gave before was the infamous dossier about the WMDs.
You are acting like The Sun wrote the dossier, published it with their
“HE’S GOT ‘EM, LET’S GET HIM”
Headline and Blair declared war because of it.

The actual sequence of events was the Government wrote the dossier and released it to the press.
Blair took us to war because of the dossier.
The admittedly unhelpful and inflammatory headlines around it may have created some public support for military action but they weren’t the reason for Blair’s actions. And The Sun and The Star are not exactly my go to sources of truth.

The MSM simply reported on what the dossier said.
You could argue that they should have examined the truth of the dossier’s claims which is fairly reasonable but some of the claims were unsourced and when doubts about the dossier came to light they reported that too.

Your sources are bad. The ones you’ve posted here are all conspiracy theory nuts who spout things which are laughably easy to debunk. You have a clear pattern of disregarding any evidence which doesn’t confirm your worldview. Several others have picked you up on this. It’s the mindset of a conspiracy theorist.
Most of then wild claims in your rant at Gary are demonstrably false.

Oh, and the Covid comment was a joke, you humourless berk.

And your excuses for a thoroughly corrupted government and media - save them for more gullible people. You'll find plenty of takers. Or maybe you even believe what you are saying. It's theoretically possible, I suppose. I wonder what your limits are, before you say - wait, that's pretty bad.

[Niall_Quinn]

Oh, and go ahead and just LIST my "conspiracy theory" sources. I'm not even asking you to put some work in and debunk them - LOL, as if.

Just list them. A few of them. Two of them. One?

[Xhaka Can’t]

Slink away. Expected.

From what?

A scattergun mess of a reply full of unsupported assertions arguing against points I’ve not made?

Everything in your post is just a diatribe of uncontrolled anger and a blind belief in what you want to believe.

The people in power decided what was evidence and what wasn’t.

Redacted evidence is not evidence.

Unreleased evidence is not evidence.

Interpreted evidence without the raw product is not evidence.

There is simply no way you can reach such a positive and assured opinion on innocence or guilt based on such a flawed system of justice where those who hold the majority, hold the power over what is and what isn’t relevant or even made public.

There has been zero transparency.

[Niall_Quinn]

From what?

A scattergun mess of a reply full of unsupported assertions arguing against points I’ve not made?

Everything in your post is just a diatribe of uncontrolled anger and a blind belief in what you want to believe.

The people in power decided what was evidence and what wasn’t.

Redacted evidence is not evidence.

Unreleased evidence is not evidence.

Interpreted evidence without the raw product is not evidence.

There is simply no way you can reach such a positive and assured opinion on innocence or guilt based on such a flawed system of justice where those who hold the majority, hold the power over what is and what isn’t relevant or even made public.

There has been zero transparency.

You used to be a balanced, reasonable, rational individual. And now this.

Everyone has always known what I am. I haven't changed. You have. You can make these crazy justifications to yourself and believe them. That's not my business, I don't care, but it should be a problem for you.

All this redacted, unsubstantiated bullshit you are going on about. So what? It's the stuff that hasn't been redacted and has been substantiated that you have to explain away. And you are trying to do that by roping everything in with a single excuse you can cling to.

Here's the fact that underlies it all. Obama's administration and the FBA colluded to undermine the Trump campaign and then the Trump presidency. That's what the evidence we have says. And that's not even close to the main problem, illegal as it is. The main problem is they then turned the whole thing around and accused their victim of their own crime.

And I told you all this before anything came to light. Because only a fool would have ever believed the ridiculous and transparent efforts of the establishment to derail a presidency they never wanted. Much like Brexit.

My "conspiracy theories" are supported by fact. Yours aren't. You can try and spin it any way you want, I can't stop you. But you should probably try to stop yourself. Your choice though.