It’s not “my” data. It’s ONS/Government data.
I have no ability to gather my own data, nor do you.
But if you have a different source which tells a different story then great, let me see it.
You keep talking about fake tests but have failed to explain why the cases would correlate with hospitalisations and deaths.
You say you are basing your opinions on data. Me too. I’ve shown you what data I’m using. If you think that data is wrong then ok, show me the data you are looking at. Or if you think my conclusions are wrong then explain why.
Last October I was arguing with my nephew - he has been a “we all need to hide under our beds” person throughout this. He was wringing his hands about piles of bodies in the streets. I was telling him to stop being ridiculous and I pointed out that for all the cases the actual overall death rate was only a few percent above the average. At the time I said that I was right. But that number kept growing. By Christmas it was 30% above average and by mid February it peaked at 44% above. I still think my nephew is too hysterical, but I have to admit I got that wrong. I wasn’t expecting a big wave of deaths in a second wave but that’s what the data shows. It was a colleague who pointed out the correlation between cases and deaths, I checked and saw he was right.
As I said, if the data I’m looking at is wrong or, worse, deliberately fraudulent then all bets are off. But you haven’t provided any alternative stats - or if you have then I’ve missed it, I’ve not deliberately ignored it.