What lie?
There's no tyranny because under no sensible definition of the word would our government fit into it."Not on my street", probably doesn't ring a bell for you? There's no tyranny because you are "allowed" to go clubbing? It's just Australia, part of the British Commonwealth?
You actually commended our government for trying to balance liberty with the dealing of the pandemic. Boris may be many things but a tyrant isn't one of them.
Whatever the relationship between Australia and the UK we have separate governments who have handled this situation in very different ways.
Right, so if you're talking about the Australian response to the pandemic I have dealt with this at more length elsewhere.the question remains, why are you applying caveats or even affording consideration to naked authoritarianism? What sort of person does that?
TL;DR - I don't approve if their handling of it.
I don't particularly approve of our government's either, but we have at least erred on the side of liberty. That has been at the cost of lives and I think they should have taken quicker action at times, but overall they've tried to balance the necessity of dealing with the pandemic with respecting people's liberty.
But the underlying point is that all these measures are temporary and designed to deal with a situation. The proof of that is that the measures have consistently changed as the data has.
I don't believe for one minute that there is any long term strategy to stop people going about their daily business. Why would there be?