2020 US General Election

[Letters]

Mathematics already demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.

Cool. Present your evidence.
*crickets*

[Niall_Quinn]

Right down at the lowest end of the information chain you'll find the repeaters pumping out, what they assume is, helpful propaganda. But because they have no actual understanding about what they are pushing, they never know when to stop pushing it. So they end up looking ridiculous and achieving the opposite outcome to that intended. The lack of down-ticket votes is one such instance. If the propagandist had even a basic understanding they would quickly change course rather than keep steering into the same storms.

[Niall_Quinn]

Another key role of the propagandist is to keep a thread rolling so pertinent information can quickly be buried. On GW we are privileged to have a moderator to do that job.

[Mac76]

Another key role of the propagandist is to keep a thread rolling so pertinent information can quickly be buried. On GW we are privileged to have a moderator to do that job.

So what do you call your own spamming of this board then?

[Niall_Quinn]

So what do you call your own spamming of this board then?

I'd call it much the opposite of what you do.

[Letters]

So they end up looking ridiculous.

Like you did when I took apart your lies about the USPS dude? That was pretty embarrassing, wasn't it?
It's things like that which are why you have no credibility on here.
You bounce from one conspiracy theory to the next and as each one is debunked you don't even acknowledge it, you just move on to the next one.

Come on, dude. Explain to us poor low information saps how the maths demonstrates that the election was stolen.
And while you're there any thoughts about why only the Presidential election was stolen but the Senate one, on the same ballots, was not?
That would be an odd thing to do, wouldn't it?

[Niall_Quinn]

And the "moderator" will press the same lies again and again. In his USPS blockbusting expose, where the witness "recanted" (more of his fake news, of course), when he was pulled up on his fakery, when it was demonstrated the witness had done the very opposite to what the fake news was claiming, the moderator then changed the context and has, ever since, tried to frame the discussion to avoid his culpability in spreading fake news. As always, he takes his own sin and pins it on another, then issues his indignant condemnations.

His other tactic is to ignore what is being said, claim it has never been said and then demand it be said. And because his own vocabulary is somewhat limited and commensurate with his general level of knowledge, and willingness to pursue knowledge, he'll try to impress by using the victim's language and phrasing. You can hand this guy any sort of information and watch him skip it, blast out spam to send it back down the order, and then claim it never existed in the first place. Twice, I believe, he's been handed the name of the individual who has probably, to date, done the best mathematical work in identifying the irregularities and implausibilities in the stolen election. His response is to demand the information. He was handed a thousand links just last night, but his aim is not to do work or exert effort, it is to dismiss and bury such information with his claims the information does not exist. Much the same as the mainstream fake news media, because that's how dishonest people behave. He still pushes the claim that evidence has been tossed out of court, even though he's been handed a detailed analysis by a lawyer which explains how and why evidence has not yet been tested in a court. It could be laziness, refusal to consider information that might disrupt his view, trolling, an inability to process mildly complex issues, or all of these among other flaws that will then see him repeating the same lie over and over again.

And he'll just keep doing it. People probably don't have the time or the inclination to go back through the thread and see him doing it, but they could if they wanted to. This, apart from the fact I'd agreed not to communicate with him following his last bout of censorship, is the main reason why I avoid him now. It's impossible to have an honest discussion with a fundamentally dishonest individual who has a corrupted character. It's also unreasonably time consuming and that time is inevitably wasted. This hasn't prevented me trying to educate him in the past, and when you watch him hit Google so he can copy and paste his latest opinion based on his 30 seconds of newfound expertise, the mere fact he has exposed himself to information he would normally avoid could be seen as a degree of success.

I mention any of this for those who wish to follow the thread and find my responses to this corrupted individual. To do so, and to avoid me having to repeat myself, scroll back through the record and everything he claims does not exist is available for review.

[Letters]

As a wise man once said...

Jesus you talk some utter bollocks

https://newsthump.com/2020/12/03/whi...f-their-grief/

[Niall_Quinn]

Several cases, at least two from Trump's campaign, and a number brought by other organisations and individuals, are heading to SCOTUS with all state and federal roadblocks cleared away. Let's see if the court favours law and the Constitution above politics.

[Letters]

Let's see if the court favours law and the Constitution above politics.

The way you phrased this is interesting and it’s a common tactic in conspiracy theories.
So some cases are going to be heard at the Supreme Court.
Ok, cool. Let’s see how good the evidence really is then.
But you phrase this in a way which means you don’t need to reconsider your opinion about that whichever way it goes. If the cases succeed then you can say “told you so”.
If they fail then instead of any introspection and consideration that you may have been wrong you simply reframe it as the court being more interested in politics than the law.
Can you really not see that you’re doing this?