It wouldn't, though. Because that's not how conspiracy theories work.
The people who believe in these theories would just double down and start claiming that those counts are corrupt in some way.
Georgia already had a recount which found no major discrepancies, so now that becomes "well of course it didn't, they just recounted the fraudulent ballots".
The very people demanding recounts just dismiss the results when they don't show what they want them to.
It's been interesting on here and in other places watching how these conspiracy theories develop in real time.
As every part of the theory is debunked people just move on to another part, never stopping to consider that they may be mistaken.
As more people speak out about Trump's ridiculous embarrassing attempt to stay in power (which he knows won't succeed, he's just on a money raising venture to cover election debts and, yes, maybe position himself for another run in 2024) the people speaking out simply become part of the conspiracy, in the theorists minds.
Conspiracy theories work by starting with the premise and then cherry picking evidence to fit that narrative. Any that shows the premise to be incorrect is simply declared to be false or part of the conspiracy.