2020 US General Election

[Niall_Quinn]

No talk of the rampaging censorship either. Maybe the "good" people here have been censored? Otherwise I'm sure they'd be as outraged as they were when they found time to voice their opinion on every minute detail of Trump's existence. Remember how LOUD they were?

I find it hard to believe they might be the very worst hypocrites, shallow, spineless sheep people who bleat on demand and then cower and quiver when the whip is held in reserve. That's just not credible, is it?

Silence is golden when you aren't encumbered by character.

[Letters]

I find it hard to believe they might be the very worst hypocrites, shallow, spineless sheep people who bleat on demand and then cower and quiver when the whip is held in reserve. That's just not credible, is it?

Or, maybe, they don’t agree with you about Biden and Trump.

Silence is golden when you aren't encumbered by character.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

[Letters]

Funny, sad, expected, obvious but trivial stuff - everyone knew he was senile and infirm, even the very few who voted for him. Oh sorry, I mean 80 million. Christ knows how that kite still flies.

I think it’s because of all the counts, recounts and signature audits, all of which have reaffirmed the result.

And the complete failure of anyone to provide any evidence of fraud which stood up to the basic scrutiny. Amazingly the USPS dude who you claimed alleged fraud (actually he half heard a conversation and his “mind might have made up the rest” ) wasn’t the smoking gun that cracked the whole thing wide open.
And the Kraken washed up dead on the shore of course.

You made multiple claims of fraud, failed to back up any with evidence of course.
Dead people voting - where’s the evidence? The spot checks showed the people were very much alive. In the infamous Georgia call Trump alleged thousands of dead voters without providing evidence. He was told that they’d looked into it and found only 2 instances and, like many facts, it just bounced off him. He simply repeated the claim. I know someone else who does that .

You claimed that more people voted than were registered. Well that’s an easy one to prove. Surely you could have provided evidence for that or some could have provided in court. Why wasn’t it? You know why, of course. It just wasn’t true.

And of course you repeatedly failed to address why the Dems would rig the Presidential election but not the Senate one on the same ballots.

Even Trump Tweeted that it was the most secure election in US history...and them managed to claim it had been stolen from him in the same Tweet

Logical consistency was never Trump’s strong point.
That reminds me of someone too...

[Ollie the Optimist]

Sidney Powell who was one of hte lawyers trying to overturn the election in Trumps favour is being sued by Dominion after accusing them of stealing the election. They are suing her for over a billion dollars.

She has filled a defence which states that her claims should not have been taken literally.

So one of hte lawyers who argued the election was stolen from Trump is now using the defence that she shouldnt have been taken seriously

https://www.businessinsider.com/sidn...21-3?r=US&IR=T

[GP]

Hopefully she's disbarred, convicted, jailed and executed.

[Niall_Quinn]

Trump's determination to start his own social network platform is a dreadful and useless idea he should ditch immediately. Social media is never going to be useful for informing people. It's a sea of uninformed fools being led by the usual fanatics. It may have been a useful avenue for bypassing the corrupt and biased fake news media, but that doesn't mean that usefulness is long term and doesn't degrade into the sewer through which all social media eventually flows.

If he wanted to do something genuinely useful he'd throw his cash behind a real media platform, with genuine investigative reporters, real news stories and an absolute commitment from him that he wouldn't interfere in any way to prevent reporters going where the story led. Now that would be highly useful as we don't currently have any high profile platforms that perform this role.

Doubt it will happen though. We'll end up with just another bog with millions wading through shit to learn nothing.

[Mac76]

Hopefully she's disbarred, convicted, jailed and executed.

[Mac76]

Trump's determination to start his own social network platform is a dreadful and useless idea he should ditch immediately. Social media is never going to be useful for informing people. It's a sea of uninformed fools being led by the usual fanatics. It may have been a useful avenue for bypassing the corrupt and biased fake news media, but that doesn't mean that usefulness is long term and doesn't degrade into the sewer through which all social media eventually flows.

If he wanted to do something genuinely useful he'd throw his cash behind a real media platform, with genuine investigative reporters, real news stories and an absolute commitment from him that he wouldn't interfere in any way to prevent reporters going where the story led. Now that would be highly useful as we don't currently have any high profile platforms that perform this role.

Doubt it will happen though. We'll end up with just another bog with millions wading through shit to learn nothing.

you really do live in a world of your own

[Niall_Quinn]

you really do live in a world of your own

Yes I do. Is there any other way to live?

[Mac76]

Yes I do. Is there any other way to live?

Yes, in a world where you can actually relate to other people and not wear a tin-foil hat