2020 US General Election

[Niall_Quinn]

So, turns out, Russia is behind the Biden emails. I knew it!

[Niall_Quinn]

The Dems wanted the latest "debate" online because they "knew" they could rig the numbers. But they failed nonetheless. How fucking incompetent can you get? Biden should have had 4x the number. But he had half, at current reckoning. Although that could close in the coming days. But not to the point where Biden can demonstrate significant support. How can they not win an online debate when they control 80% of the audience? The poor tik-tok, commie saps tried to load up every device they have, but they got beaten down as badly as the last time when they actually paid the Trump campaign to try to cheat it. Millennials

This is ridiculous. It just shows how dumb the tech "experts" are on the lefty side. That's why they had to pull down their pants over the Biden corruption revelations. They don't know how to do it properly.

Clown world. Hilarious but scary. Like clowns should be.

[Letters]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54572790

[Niall_Quinn]

Anyone who ever doubted how corrupt the BBC is should read the following. Of course some will immediately take it at face value. The more discerning will pay attention to the language and understand. They impeached Trump for Biden's crime, even though Biden is on video admitting to the crime.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-54553132

Leaving the BBC's election bias to one side (and you wonder why the BBC needs to be biased in a foreign election), if they can do this once, how many times have they done this? We have establishment media, still consumed by a surprisingly large percentage of the population, lying and misleading even when it's a trivial matter to expose them. But when they are all doing it, how do you expose it? The majority of mainstream news [sic] and social media platforms are openly and unapologetically censoring information they don't want people to see. There are brainwashed packs roaming the Internet labelling anyone who brings information to light as conspiracy theorists, terminology fed into the U.S. establishment media by the CIA. And this herd believes it, they aren't doing it maliciously or for pay (in most cases), but because they have volunteered (without being asked) to defend the establishment agenda."Fact" checkers funded by mainstream censors run day and night to ensure that even when information escapes the pack, it is quickly countered by propaganda of the type seen in the BBC article above. Total information shutdown and they're betting on the majority simply accepting the propaganda as gospel because it comes from self-approved sources.

If this trajectory is not corrected, if it becomes the new normal, a few short years from now (or months, at this rate) we'll be engulfed in the very world described by Orwell, complete with a Ministry of Truth where yesterday's facts become tomorrow's conspiracy theory and new facts emerge as required, always in sympathy with the agendas of the most powerful in society. And everyone will know, but none will say anything. Because the control will be so complete it will never be worth the effort to mention truth. This is how it was in the Soviet Union where truth was painfully comical but people would only laugh in private, because to do so in public had dire consequences (not for the liar, but for the truth teller). We all remember Comical Ali standing before the ruins of Iraq and boasting about the regime's great victory. How we laughed. Now we have CNN reporters, broadcasting to a backdrop of a burning city, commending the rioters on their peaceful assembly.

This is good for nobody, except the very few who directly benefit. It is bad for everyone else, on every level. It can lead to nothing good. And it's about time everyone stood up and said enough of this shit. Whether left, right, black, white, it doesn't matter. We should all at least agree to argue facts rather than fight over lies that are manufactured by the very people who benefit most from our division.

It's time to defund the BBC, that's one thing we could do at least. It no longer serves a beneficial purpose, and hasn't for a long time. Let them continue by appealing directly for subscriptions from anyone who actually wants their service. If it's so virtuous and essential, as they claim, then they should be fine. Put it to the test.

[Niall_Quinn]

There will be fake stories about Hunter Biden and child pornography emerging soon. This is designed to distract from the real story so the fake claims can be knocked down easily and bring the real story down with it. Don't be fooled.

[Niall_Quinn]

This is why you don't have mail-in voting so far ahead of election day. There are people who already voted and are only finding out now the guy they voted for is a criminal. They should have known that beforehand, of course, but that's a consequence of the fake stream media - people are misinformed. Some of them won't care, because they'd vote for anyone provided it's not Trump. But what about voters who aren't total losers and tried to make a decision based on their beliefs and principles? What about people who genuinely thought Trump was the bad guy and Biden was the good guy? And what about the down-ticket races? None of them stood up and outed Biden. And now voters will have endorsed these cowards too.

That's why I don't vote. You vote and you are endorsing these bastards. And if you don't have an ounce of integrity that's fine, I guess, you won't lose sleep.

[Letters]

https://newsthump.com/2017/05/17/bia...ns-prejudices/

[Niall_Quinn]

WSJ has opted for CYA mode. The first crack in the dam.

[Niall_Quinn]

https://newsthump.com/2017/05/17/bia...ns-prejudices/

Paddle your way back to the shallow end, junior.

[Letters]

That's why I don't vote. You vote and you are endorsing these bastards.

That doesn’t follow at all. Your local MP is going to represent you whether you vote for them or not.
At least if you vote you get some chance of saying who that is. Often it’s the least bad option but it’s the only chance you have to have some say. Although with FPTP there is a case that in many safe seats there’s no real point in voting. Although in one of the politics unboringed videos on YouTube the dude makes a reasonable argument for doing so anyway.

At least if you vote you can say “well at least I didn’t vote for them, don’t blame me”. Or, if you did, you can think twice about whether to do so again.