Obviously that's the ultimate aim - well, it should be. But that has to be somewhat tempered by the reality of where we are right now and where we've come from.
Last year the top 2 were in their own little world. We were mixing it with everyone else and better than most but ultimately we finished 24 points off the title.
That feels like one hell of a bridge to gap in one season. If either or both of those sides is close to as good again, I can't see us seriously challenging them and I don't think that should be the criteria
I'd agree with all of that bar the first for the reason I outlined above.The base criteria for success must surely be, at least, being in the hunt for the title during the last few weeks of the season, avoiding the usual catastrophic collapse that crushes all hope of serious competition, utilising the squad properly so we don't have to hear all the usual excuses about injuries, etc, etc. That sort of stuff that so signifies a string of seasons since the last real challenge.
You can't base your expectations on our best ever seasons, they have to be based on where we are now, and where we've come from in the last few years which is:
2019/20 - 8th 56Pts
2020/21 - 8th 61Pts
2021/22 - 5th 69Pts
There has been a bit of year on year progress and I think we've made good signings, but I don't believe this year a title challenge is realistic. It would be nice, obviously, but it's not the sole criteria I'd judge any Arsenal manager on this season given the last few years.
It wouldn't.Why would scraping 4th with the usual margin between us and the eventual champions, followed by an embarrassing and inept showing in the Champions League be considered progress?