Eden Hazard would be a good addition. Saw Lille's 1st game of the season on TV, he covers some ground, and is good at set pieces.
Eden Hazard would be a good addition. Saw Lille's 1st game of the season on TV, he covers some ground, and is good at set pieces.
There are reports that Arsenal after Jadson from Shakhtar. Interesting but I do not know a lot about him.
Anyway if the figures being bandied about for Fabregas nad Nasri are correct, then Arsenal should be in position to make some significant moves. People are saying that Fabregas and Nasri would bring in about £60 million. Jadson would cost around £12 million (The Independent). There is a report that Arsenal are looking at both Hazard and Mata for around £45 million (Caughtoffside).
Those figures are pretty much a wash.
Those would fill the gaps from Fabregas and Nasri. As for the defence, I would go for Vertonghen.
While all answers are responses, not all responses are answers.
there is no question in my mind that we must buy at least 1 CB and the figures mentioned about would not allow us to do that.........don't believe we will go for Hazard anymore......we seem to have enough pace on the wing - losing Nas would minus a side player but we would suffer from pacePeople are saying that Fabregas and Nasri would bring in about £60 million. Jadson would cost around £12 million (The Independent). There is a report that Arsenal are looking at both Hazard and Mata for around £45 million
There go the goalposts!
1) Yes because those reports are much more likely knowing Wenger, he's a cheap f*cker..you have to be realistic.
2) As above Wenger won't pay top money for more established players hence the reason I'm rubbishing these reports, moreover with regards Hazard his club have said he's untransferable.
If he wasn't so cheap I wouldn't be rubbishing these reports, but we know he is....except when it comes to kids. You're imagining these goalposts.