Henry lost his pace after 30.
Torres has already lost it, seemingly.
He's not as creative as strikers like Rooney, RVP or Drogba either.
At the moment, he's as useless as that Michael Jackson statue at Craven Cottage.
Henry lost his pace after 30.
Torres has already lost it, seemingly.
He's not as creative as strikers like Rooney, RVP or Drogba either.
At the moment, he's as useless as that Michael Jackson statue at Craven Cottage.
worth a pint, more likely
http://melonsgazette.blogspot.com the blog for Italian Gooner
What's he on, about £2billion a week? We couldn't afford him even on a free.
Für eure Sicherheit
We're taking a lot of flak. . .the engine has been hit
the last 3 posts have knocked this thread out the sky
If he costs £35- and finds his form again, he would be a great buy. I reckon he would be great alongside RvP and fed by Arteta/Wilshere - again it is if he can find the form he had when he first joined Liverpool.
No thanks, he is a cunt and we have those in abundance already
Apparently said his Chelsea teammates were 'slow' in a recent interview.
Whether he meant physically or mentally am currently unsure.
I would go along with that and he could be tempted by a fresh challenge. . . .and they dont come much fresher than us but a big question is us paying that much. . . .I mean look what we did this summer. . . .we ran away every time the price went any close to what we paid for Arshavin
we sit on the sidelines watching other clubs pay the kind of money that talent demands, I mean shit we let teams pay the same kind of money for our own players who theu deem are quality but still refuse to follow suit.
Instead the biggest deal of our summer was the 12 mil paid for the Oxo kid, last seen making up the numbers at Old Trafford!
we had more than one chance to pay in quality,
1) Cahill quality(?) But better than what we have, this one I agree is not 17 mil worth and I for one thought the reported initial bid was a bit of a cute move and that we would up the ante and meet in the middle, that Cahill would be playing for us, a bit of a fuck up by us that he isn't
2) Mata, quality (yes) early signs show thus, maybe never seriously coming to us once the Chavs entered the game but we were too slow and may have been able to seal this
3) Hazard, quality (yes) too many wide players some say, dont really give a fuck as some pteams have too many midfielders and seem to do OK and dont really think so as as Walctt and Arshavin shouldnt be playing there in the first place. Classic case of avoiding the big pay out cos I think if we went close to Lilles evaluation we could have landed him. Now we will wait for Jan or next summer sales, likewise M'Vila. Both these players will no doubt end elsewhere.
Dont get me wrong, Im not gutted with who we brought in and I would hate to see us spunk our money away on big name has beens, but a 10 mil deal here, a 7 mil deal there may not be enough in the current climate.
Coney is right, a back in the day Torres for 35 mil would be a no brainer but a back in the day Torres would not go for 35.
There is no guarantee and things often are a gamble but we may, just may come out a winner or we could like the last time we broke our transfer record end up with. . . .
My last post was following Coneys. . .couldnt be bothered to edit