User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: 4 - 2 - 4

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Greenwich, Brighton.
    Posts
    306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    4-2-4, what a retarded formation. Teams need a midfield you know.

  2. #12
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,707
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Toffee View Post
    4-2-4, what a retarded formation. Teams need a midfield you know.
    They also need a defence
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  3. #13
    Member Japan Shaking All Over's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tokyo<Japan - Wandsworth>London
    Posts
    5,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think when God created football, early man played a it in a 442 formation.

    With the invention of the wheel, gunpowder and pornography, various hybrids have been created including the highly ambitious 2-5-1 1/2 -1 1/2. . . .

    I say to hell with that, time to go back to basics, matbe a tweeked version of 442, strikers playing one behind the other or if Chamak gets in alongside each other.
    We have tons of pace and not just Theo, Oxo should be out wide.

    Pre seasons or more where they are played should not matter as long as we get back in plenty of time. . .what is important is that we play preseason games with at least the main core of our squad, ummmmmm could this be why Utd are tearing teams a new hide I wonder but not very hard. . . .not rocket science

    If we had least have had some prototype CBs playing together preseason we may not be witnessing the fucking horror shows we are seeing now from players with two games together. . .

    Also formations work when you play players in their right positions, do uou think Wenger knows that?

  4. #14
    Cat give me a paw!! Flavs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Toffee View Post
    4-2-4, what a retarded formation.
    Like your genealogy then

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Greenwich, Brighton.
    Posts
    306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #16
    Member Tipsychubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Overmars View Post
    4-3-3, 4-4-2, 4-2-4...it doesn't matter.

    Learn how to bloody defend first.

  7. #17
    New Signing
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Judging by our half arsed attempts to track back by our midfielders, I'd say we've been playing 4-2-4 for quite a while

  8. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Overmars View Post
    4-3-3, 4-4-2, 4-2-4...it doesn't matter.

    Learn how to bloody defend first.

    Even against the pub team last night, the guy was totally free in the box to score.
    http://melonsgazette.blogspot.com the blog for Italian Gooner

  9. #19
    They/Them GP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    29,254
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe a 6-2-2 would be more beneficial.

  10. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    409
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm View Post
    Maybe a 6-2-2 would be more beneficial.
    Nah. We could stick all the outfield players in defense and we would still concede

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •