http://newsthump.com/2017/05/12/mill...-we-dont-care/
Might just work
http://newsthump.com/2017/05/12/mill...-we-dont-care/
Might just work
The CNN obsession with toppling Trump is very grating. You cant watch it for 5 mins without coming to a conclusion that these people are hurting badly with Hillarys loss. The Russia thing might be true but somebody pleasse provide even a tiniest bit of evidence. A tape recording, a photo of some clandestine meeting. A love letter from Trump to Putin.....something instead of constant innuendo. In the old days papers actually used to do investigative journalism. Get out of the studio and actually find someone who will confess on camera. Instead all I hear is 15 agencies agreed that Russia attempted to hack the election. Maybe the same 15 still searching for WMD`s in Iraq no doubt. BBC are hardly better, WTF is their problem?.
Make 2mrw better than 2day
Trump pretty much always says things without the tiniest bit of evidence
But I agree some media outlets are a bit too keen to jump on everything he does - although much of what he does is wrong IMO.
Obama tried to influence Brexit.....no wailing then
Last week he tried to influence the French vote.
CNN are just being spiteful
Trump is clearly no intellectual. No need for CNN to stoop to his level
Make 2mrw better than 2day
too much concentration on what he says and not on what he doesOriginally Posted by Letters
Trump pretty much always says things without the tiniest bit of evidence
But I agree some media outlets are a bit too keen to jump on everything he does - although much of what he does is wrong IMO.
what's he done is Fire an FBI director who is investigating the links between Russia and his election campaign
It was done at the recommendation of Jeff Sessions, so maybe Trump will throw him under the bus
Totally false. He fired Comey as soon as it was possible to do so, because Comey has demonstrated time and again he is incompetent and agenda driven. Not partisan, but he seems to believe the FBI is independent of the Justice Dept.
Apart from which, the whole Trump Russia thing is entirely manufactured as a distraction from the real Clinton/ Russia thing. Fairly typical establishment move, when guilty blame the other guy for your crimes.
Both highly partisan figures, Clapper and Rice, have confirmed there is absolutely zero evidence of any kind of link between the Trump team and Russia. It's a shame that such a ludicrous allegation gained legs at all, but it has been investigated and investigated again and will be investigated once more by the FBI (Comey's firing makes no difference to that fact) and nothing has, nor will anything be turned up. I suppose the next lunacy will be to say there's no evidence because Trump is a master at hiding his tracks. The establishment has descended into mental illness driven by the critically timely derailing of Clinton's planned ushering into office (something key elements of the Republican so-called right were also heavily involved in).
What we can say, with certainty, is Clinton is NOT very good at covering her tracks. And nor, it is emerging, is Obama. I doubt the anointed nobody will ever face justice but it's starting to look like Hillary will get fried. No competent or diligent law enforcement official will look the other way as Comey did.
Für eure Sicherheit
The BBC is long since exposed to all but fools. The job of the BBC is to guard the gate and parrot the prevailing establishment line, regardless of who is "in power" at any given time. It has done that job since inception and nothing has changed. It has always been eminently untrustworthy, though it never used to throw it's credibility so casually in the gutter as it did commencing with the Iraqi WMD fiasco. And of course we saw with Saville how meshed the whole philosophy of the BBC is with the establishment and their strange and repulsive tastes. A thoroughly rotten organisation, which is why people have to be forced under threat of penalty to fund it.
Für eure Sicherheit
The greatest Irony is that if Clinton had won, she would probably had fired Comey within a week of being sworn in. The woman has a long history of settling vendettas very quickly some would even say conclusively. Even as spouse in the WH. You didnt cross her and get away unscathed.
Last edited by Globalgunner; 12-05-2017 at 04:23 PM.
Make 2mrw better than 2day
That's the point. The real culprits here are the very same people making the loudest noise. The only reason these crazy stories about Russians have gained any traction, rather that derisory laughs, is down to the left wing media's willingness to sell what they know to be fake news and to perpetuate it no matter what evidence does or doesn't arise. They have to do that because if the noise stops then the real scandals come into focus. So a left wing that hates Comey now loves Comey. It's more noise for the news cycle and they couldn't give a shit if people gawp at the naked hypocrisy. As for logic, why would they even want a guy they all claimed was biased against them to investigate Trump? Wouldn't a guy that biased just double down by cooking the investigation? Nothing the left says makes the slightest sense any more.
Für eure Sicherheit
Reply With Quote
