Evidently I don’t watch as much Kids TV as you, but I’m not seeing this army of gay characters. But I watch plenty of cartoons and stuff with my nephew and it’s just possible that you might be overanalysing shit.Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Again you’ve mentioned one Disney related thing with a gay character
And most people don’t give a shit one way or the other
But again I’m waiting for myriad examples of this Queer Shit
It already does exist, it’s niche porn. I’m fairly sure not seen sex in any kids program. Apart from the vaguest nod nod wink references that have been around forever.
My brother had a gay house mate
Said he knew John Barrowman. Said he was just a total prick, like Kevin Spacey would get his knob out loads
I suspect we will see more gay/trans characters. But TV isn't "infested" with them.
So the show me one gay character stand wasn't as defiant as we initially thought. We're on another hill now, equally defiant.
Don't forget Disney has many strings to its bow, not just the kids side of things. The absurdly liberal ABC, poor old Lucasfilm with it's pathetic new offerings, Touchstone, even ESPN fell victim to politically correct bullshit earlier in the year. You want me to find a gay, trans and liberal crap in that lot? Not much of a challenge, is it?
Für eure Sicherheit
No I think it’s just reasonable when you’re making the argument that you literally can’t avoid exposing children to the gay agenda, for me to ask where it appears other than beauty and the beast.
I’ve not tried to deny that there are gay people and gay characters on television full stop. But your argument seems to be I just want one thing that isn’t part of a massive liberal or fag agenda. And my contention is that with most television it’s only there if you’re really going out of your way looking for it to begin with.
The last thing I watched that had any gay shit in it was House of Cards. Do I particularly like seeing two guys kissing not really but I’m not thinking this is an overt attempt to push an envelope. Is it the kind of thing that would have been on television up until say the 1980s no probably not, but television in general has got more explicit with what it shows gay or straight.
Okay, so we're not going to benefit by going round and around on this. It's preposterous to suggest TV and film hasn't been drowned in the gay and now trans agenda - the whole PC agenda. And not in a constructive way either, but as pure vandalism and one-upMANship in most cases. Lesbian Ghostbusters because - why? Star Trek, old characters dragged into the gay gutter because - no reason other than pandering, new ones so fucked up they are called Michael (or should that be Michelle?). The whole Dr Who debacle - the assistants are fags, the Master turns female and now the Doctor too. But no, there's no agenda. It's a coincidence. I don't watch all the shitty soap operas the average viewer consumes, but I'd put money on these being a key incubator for this bullshit.
Here's some fag in the Guardian moaning on about the problem. Seems he's saying that while gay shit on screen is certainly more prevalent, there's just not enough close up sodomy to satiate his deviant appetite.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...gay-characters
Almost all normal people now accept fags and lesbians and even the weirdo transgender lot. Why is it so important to be subjected to their antics on screen too? They have their own gay channels, why can't they watch those and leave the rest of us alone? I wonder what would happen if a hetero channel was suggested? I wonder.
Für eure Sicherheit
Were any of the women in that awful ghostbuster film lesbians
Literally have no idea what you’re talking about in Star Trek
Doctor Who I’ll cede your point. I don’t really give a fuck though. Of course you’ll get some soft headed cunt that looks upon it like a milestone in gay rights. Where as the average arsehole thinks oh the weird looking black girl likes girls. Don’t get me wrong because of the horrendous writing the tokenism shines through, when it’s not a thing it’s a non issue.
What you seem to be referring to in most instances is how stupid people talk about what is or what should be in tv programs rather than the tv programs themselves
And you’re also complaining that tv reflects on homosexuality like it’s no big deal? It’s cos it isn’t. And that’s societies attitude in general. I’m not seeing gays or gay sex all the time on tv, what I’m seeing is the same attitude I have...who gives a shit.
In western society statistically 1 in 10 people is meant to be gay, I see a lot less of gays on my screen than 10% of the time.
Last edited by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie; 14-12-2017 at 07:48 PM.
You don't watch as much TV as me I suppose - and I don't watch much at all.
Yes, it was a big thing. The first Lezzie Buster. Which is fine, because they'd already fucked over a cult film by that stage so any more damage was negligible. I don't give a fuck about Dr Who either, it was already unwatchable thanks to the idiots misdirecting the carnage. The gay/ trans thing doesn't bother me nearly as much as the gloating desire to wreck screen traditions. There's quite obviously an agenda based on fucking with TV/ film icons, legends, landmarks - like if they can bring these down then all else follows. Is that the point of "inclusiveness"? To wreak revenge and destruction on the "other" lot because of all the perceived injustices of the past? So they are as bad as us male heteros the? When it all boils down? Fine. Let's just have a war - one arsehole vs another (not literally, in case they get too eager). That article had Benedict Watshisface platying that queer Turing. I have no problem with that whatsoever and would have been offended if they suddenly tried to make that character straight. Why would they do that? I wouldn't be offended based on the sexuality, but the lack of attention to history and the resulting political vandalism.
Let me ask you - when you go out the door, do you REALLY see 10% of people mincing down the road? The 10% thing is and always has been bullshit. Gays and especially trans are like every other fucking non-important noisy minority. Making a big deal of who they shag and how they shag them. Keep that shit in the bedroom or under the bridge or wherever. Now talk to me about the growing number of people living in abject poverty - why aren't we seeing the true face of Britain reflected on our screens? That's not as desirable as fantasy gay land for some reason.
Für eure Sicherheit
I’m not really following you on any of this. Again with Ghostbusters what the fuck are you on about?. That it happens to be women instead of guys?...not getting the lesbian connection though.
What was the other thing Star Trek? The main character is a woman and black? Well the main character in deep space nine is black and the main character in voyager is a woman. Both shows well over twenty years old.
As for rewriting certain characters to be gay? Maybe in jerk off fan fiction.
Four years ago (two years before she died) my mum brought back bed bugs from a hospital. For the next two years after that the poor deluded woman was convinced they were everywhere. You’re starting to remind me a bit of her. Looking at things through a magnifying glass and saying “hmm that seems a bit queer friendly”
You’re the one convinced that queers are all up in your face. The 1 in ten seems believable to me because apart from the queer journalists and writers you seem intent on Triggering yourself about, people just want to get on with their lives.
Reply With Quote
