"Currants Bw..."

[Niall_Quinn]

I thought Trump had plunged the world into a nuclear holocaust with all his stupid talk and refusal to bow and scrape Uncle Tom style?

Or did none of that happen and we just move on?

I thought Trump was supposed to be wrong about everything. And yet?

Where are the Russians, are they out from under the bed yet?

Isn't is simply stunning how incompetent and deceitful the legacy media is, BBC being one of the very worst examples. They'll try to palm this off now as a South Korean initiative, despite having to admit it will be US delegates who finally sit down and talk.

It's remarkable how so many people continue to read the BBC. For what purpose? It's hard to imagine.

[GP]

I agree, Trump an incompetent, paedophile rapist.

[Niall_Quinn]

I agree, Trump an incompetent, paedophile rapist.

You're not even a convincing troll.

[Letters]

People should still to more reliable, balanced sources like Breitbart and tinfoilhat.com

[GP]

You're not even a convincing troll.

Since when is accurately describing a person considered trolling?

[Letters]

I thought Trump had plunged the world into a nuclear holocaust with all his stupid talk and refusal to bow and scrape Uncle Tom style?

Or did none of that happen and we just move on?

No, you were right all along. The thing that pretty much no-one everyone but you thought would happen didn't happen.

[HCZ]

I thought Trump had plunged the world into a nuclear holocaust with all his stupid talk and refusal to bow and scrape Uncle Tom style?

Or did none of that happen and we just move on?

I thought Trump was supposed to be wrong about everything. And yet?

Where are the Russians, are they out from under the bed yet?

Isn't is simply stunning how incompetent and deceitful the legacy media is, BBC being one of the very worst examples. They'll try to palm this off now as a South Korean initiative, despite having to admit it will be US delegates who finally sit down and talk.

It's remarkable how so many people continue to read the BBC. For what purpose? It's hard to imagine.

It’s about as convincing as believing Trumps tweets had anything to do with Kim Jong Uns sudden desire to talk

And just to clarify I’m not saying you do believe that

This hive mind legacy media you keep talking about is interested in one thing only sensationalism. Trump says what he says for attention a insatiable desire for it, it’s been that way with him for almost fourty years.

And the media sells papers and wins Neilson ratings contests by reporting on that

Trump could have said he will bomb Pyongyang at a designated date and time, I wouldn’t have batted an eyelid.

[Niall_Quinn]

People should still to more reliable, balanced sources like Breitbart and tinfoilhat.com

And that would excuse the BBC, would it?

Long record of you pitching up, spouting legacy media bullshit and then stuffing it down the memory hole. And you'll do it again, tomorrow and the day after.

[Niall_Quinn]

No, you were right all along. The thing that pretty much no-one everyone but you thought would happen didn't happen.

I was exaggerating to try to capture the general hysteria of you leftie lunatics.

[Letters]

I was exaggerating to try to capture the general hysteria of you leftie lunatics.

Yes. We were all hiding under our beds.
Or laughing at the silly posturing by both of them acting like two toddlers.
One of those.

Long record of you dismissing things but not providing any basis for alternative views.
You act as if you reading different things and parroting different sources (which you rarely if ever cite) makes you an independent thinker.
It really doesn't.