"Currants Bw..."

[Letters]

Of course you'll try to make it about a single article.

I'm not trying to make anything about anything. I don't even know what "it" is here.
Your Pavlovian response about the BBC was prompted by me posting that article so it seems fairly reasonable to ask what your issue is with that article.
I don't expect your issue with the BBC to be because of one article but if this is an example then explain why.

"Avalanche" wasn't a typo, it was a quote. And in the article the response from the university was given. So is your issue the headline?
If so then you have a point.

[Niall_Quinn]

I'm not trying to make anything about anything. I don't even know what "it" is here.
Your Pavlovian response about the BBC was prompted by me posting that article so it seems fairly reasonable to ask what your issue is with that article.
I don't expect your issue with the BBC to be because of one article but if this is an example then explain why.

"Avalanche" wasn't a typo, it was a quote. And in the article the response from the university was given. So is your issue the headline?
If so then you have a point.

Here's my Pavlovian response, you thoroughly deceitful wretch.

So are we starting to sort of, maybe, in the loosest sense - agree on what constitutes fake news? Serious question. How much bullshit can the BBC spout before people start to doubt it as a viable source of information?

Can we, in the most reasonable terms, now assume - after all that has passed - the BBC is fake news?

Serious question.

It's a question. And a qualified one too - "after all that has passed".

But it's about scoring points for you, so naturally you have changed the nature and intent of the response to suit your dishonest purpose.

[Letters]

Here's my Pavlovian response, you thoroughly deceitful wretch.

Have you been using the Shakespearian insult generator again?

Really is quite amusing how you can hold so many contradictory thoughts in your head without seemingly realising it.
You have previously said you think that people are, in general, decent. Yet every time people disagree with you it's because they're dishonest or deceitful or have some nefarious purpose.

[Niall_Quinn]

Have you been using the Shakespearian insult generator again?

Really is quite amusing how you can hold so many contradictory thoughts in your head without seemingly realising it.
You have previously said you think that people are, in general, decent. Yet every time people disagree with you it's because they're dishonest or deceitful or have some nefarious purpose.

Now you are pretending the initial conversation was a disagreement. Any manoeuvre to spin an advantageous angle. I didn't even reply when you started your usual bullshit. I left it. YOU brought it back up. Your deceit in action, once again. Nothing seeming about it, at all.

[Xhaka Can’t]

I wish I was back in Greece.

Even more so now.

[Letters]

Now I think he’s arguing with himself so I’ll leave him to it

Also, Charlie Hebdo

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-53985407

[Niall_Quinn]

Now I think he’s arguing with himself so I’ll leave him to it

Also, Charlie Hebdo

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-53985407

The facts always see you fucking off. Lightweight.

[Letters]

He no longer likes to move it


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53993125

Erick Morillo

[Letters]

Lightweight.

I have lost a bit of weight during all this nonsense. Thanks for noticing

[Mac76]

I have lost a bit of weight during all this nonsense. Thanks for noticing

really? most people have put it on

i think i've more or less maintained my spare tyre at about the same amount