I’m off to bed - the board is all yours.
I’m off to bed - the board is all yours.
If you don’t send this signature to ten people, you will become a Spurs fan.
Well, that's not a person. Should we also arrest Twitter or the moon? Sorry, that was a somewhat flippant start to what is supposed to be a more serious post.
So let's start again here:
Are they, though? Yes, the initial report on the BBC was about a Russian missile. Literally the next morning they led with Biden saying it probably wasn't Russian.
This morning there was an article on the BBC with the headline "Ukraine war: Kyiv not to blame for Poland missile - Zelensky".
It's basically Zelensky saying "it wasn't me" and is full of quotes from people saying they're pretty sure it wasn't from Russia and that Ukraine is the more likely source.
So are the media really pushing it? I pick the BBC because it's a source I look at a lot and one you have a particular distain for.
The idea that it was a Russian missile was an obvious initial conclusion, given that it's Russia who have been peppering Ukraine with missiles. And I'm not just saying that because the BBC told me, a colleague is from Ukraine. He lives in Poland but his family are back in Kyiv and he's been telling me bits about the reality on the ground. But they didn't persist with the idea of it being a Russian missile when more
You do have a brain, but you also have extreme biases and a worldview which makes you jump to wrong conclusions a lot.
You have an extreme suspicion of authority which makes you see nefarious motives where they don't always exist.
I've been through examples multiple times so let's not go round that loop again.
You said you've tried to educate "these people". The way to do that is not to strut around saying you know more about things than us idiots (even if that's true).
If you know stuff we don't - and that's certainly true on this topic, I'd be the first to admit my ignorance of all the geopolitical history of Ukraine and Russia - then cool, so explain stuff and ideally provide sources to back things up.
Just calling people who don't see things your way stupid isn't going to engage people.
Cunts, the lot of them!
It's glorious. Super entertaining.You do have a brain, but you also have extreme biases and a worldview which makes you jump to wrong conclusions a lot.
A fully erect defence of the BBC and their "obvious initial conclusion" followed up by a criticism of my tendency to jump to conclusions.
I love it.
Für eure Sicherheit
You said:
This is not true. Well, it's certainly not true on the BBC. Is it elsewhere?But the media is still pushing the Russian missile thing
And the difference is even if it was the BBC "jumping to conclusions", they almost immediately corrected that as new information came in.
You jump to conclusions and then refuse to acknowledge you were wrong even when shown to be conclusively.
I find it amazing that given the amount of times you stated the US election was fraudulent etc that you just seemingly accept the russian sham elections held in Donbas etc as completely fair and free.
The russians are incompetent and losing when it comes to their military. They have lost more men then in their entire campagin in Afghan and more equipment. They have now lost cities that they won back in march. We have seen videos of the russian army being completely useless as their tanks etc are blown up by Ukrainians.
And if you really want to go further and believe everything Russia say, their equipment is even worse then we think given the amount of times ammutions explode and sink their flagship or blow up bridges in crimea etc.