Sagna was offered a new contract but he decided he wanted a big pay off to sit on the bench at city.
Song's poor attitude and indiscipline meant he was actively shown the door.
Simple stuff.
Printable View
It really is ridiculous but we’re only inflating our own wage bill for no reason. The demand for the player has to be there at least and there has to be a real threat of the player walking :lol:. I just don’t see that as a possibility with a good chunk of the players we offer new contracts. Ox, Gibbs, Ramsey….They’re happy and just want to play and improve.
Let’s say a club like City wanted to take Wilshere off our hands, they’ll just gazump his current deal and if we wanted to keep him, we’d have to be prepared to match the offer he’s received. But if they are offering him £200k to gazump our £110k, I can’t see us keeping him either way. We’re just making it difficult for ourselves in the long run. If we had a good young player on £50k and these vultures come in and try to double his wages, we’d at least be able to match that if he asks for us to match the offer. We can’t if we’re already at stretching point with these guys wages.
:doh: What did I say about Sagna? We weren't willing to match the price. His loss, our loss. But when you compare that situation of a long serving player for a injury prone player...it's a bit silly.
Song....bollocks. He suddenly developed such a poor attitude that we had to sell him? You think we'd have sold if Barca offered us £5m? Rubbish!
:lol:
:rimshot:
:lol:
It's pretty well known. You can make something else up though if it suits your own agenda.
Song had discipline problems? Thats news to me.