I remember their article saying "Were Man City lucky?" against us. And indeed, yesterday.
Printable View
I remember their article saying "Were Man City lucky?" against us. And indeed, yesterday.
Adam crafton from the daily mail did a clickbait article doing a combined arsenal spurs XI where he chose a complete Tottenham team and most experts chose heavily dominated spurs teams and now he's crying because of the abuse he's getting :haha:
'Re this: I picked a team. Arsenal won. I look a bit silly. Congrats to Arsenal. But since they tweeted it to 12m people, I've had all-day harassment on here, including anti-Semitic, homophobic abuse & people wishing me dead. I can handle it but would not advise clubs repeat this.'
Imagine writing a clickbait looking to get a reaction then complaining when getting it :haha: Not to mention he works for a rag that peddles hate :haha:
https://twitter.com/AdamCrafton_/sta...301434880?s=17
Arsenal F.C. tweeted what I thought was a light hearted and amusing response to his wanky article. But then some people were a little bit mean on Twitter and he blamed the club for that. It’s Twitter, if there wasn’t racist, homophobic abuse and threats of violence and sexual assault it wouldn’t be Twitter.
He can f*ck off the clickbaiting c*nt.
Matt '26 stone' Dunn trying his hardest to not give any praise on Sunday supplement.
Martin samuel: MOTD made the game look very very even but all the energy came from Arsenal
:bow:
Martin Samuel said the article was just a bit of fun. :sarcy:
Why do they use phrases like 'telling indictment' then?
Matt Dunn admitting it's all about the narrative when it comes to newspapers and Martin Samuel admits the size of a club determines the number of clicks it generates, subconsciously admitting they target arsenal with clickbait to get more traffic.
That explains everything.
Rob Harris said he heard monkey noises from Arsenal fans when dele alli got subb'd off
NQ :doh:
You didn't tell us you were at the game yesterday :doh: