Unai says the contract situation won't change a thing. He says Ramsey will still play a part on Saturday. :doh: What sense does that make?
Printable View
The way I see it is that half the squad needs replacing. If we were going to stop playing Ramsey because he doesn't have a future with us he wouldn't be the only one.
We still have to put 11 players out there and win matches. There's no reason to shoot ourselves in the foot by sticking Ramsey in the reserves. We're in four competitions so make use of him until he's gone.
That’s exactly right. Plus, it’s not the 70s anymore. You don’t just drop players who might be leaving into the reserves. That’s a fan fantasy. Ramsey being banished would affect the squad far more than him remaining present. And as you say, our squad isn’t exactly the best so he’s a body that’ll be needed. You use the players available to you while you have them. Managers and fellow players are more than used to these sort of contract issues dragging on. When it becomes a saga then it’s a problem. But Ramsey won’t kick up any fuss and will keep his head down and work.
Mkhitaryan, Iwobi and even Welbeck are in better form than Ramsey. Ramsey hasn't been playing well for us. It makes no sense to keep these guys out of the starting line up when they're on form but to keep Ramsey starting games, play him into form and to establish a partnership with the front line players only for him to leave in January or the Summer. Senseless.
We're in a rebuilding period and trying to establish a style of play. Bench Ramsey. He should only he starting cup games.
We should sign this guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jizz_Hornkamp
A commentator's dream
"Jizz is all over the place"
:haha:
His mum named him after the thing she loves the most.