It's possible but it didn't look like we wanted to keep him either way.
Printable View
It's possible but it didn't look like we wanted to keep him either way.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by GB.
its also possible the agent is chatting shite so that his player doesnt take the blameQuote:
Originally Posted by Jam Persie
His agent is Darren Dein, he's obviously full of shite.Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
Song did say to the press that he was happy at Arsenal though. Who knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
well there you go then. its never the players fault according to their agents.
Well, it's hard to know exactly what goes on. I don't believe the agent much. I also find it hard to believe that Song has been a problem player for years. It does make sense though that he was never perhaps perfect in his professionalism but close enough to where he needed to be. This may have changed as he wanted improved terms and his reaction to not getting what he wanted was to be unprofessional, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
Of course. But it is a lot easier to call the players and agents ****s rather than look at a trend that keeps recurring at afc. Aw & phw know this works very well with the fansQuote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
Or maybe he stepped on Wengers shoes and now the new arse kicking wenger was not best pleased and told him to shine that shit or fuck off!
I would like to know why the club should have to renegotiate his contract with when it's still got 3 years left to run.
2 years yes fair enough but not 3. All clubs need to have a certain amount of control over their players or they would forever be trying to renegotiate to get more money.
I do agree that Song should be paid at least on a par with chakma though.
Song has previous with his national side, probably not a huge leap to think he may have been a little bit of a **** with us.
I think he was just sold because Wenget wants to reshape the team and he viewed Song as expendable.
Wenger told him to go and get his fuckin shinebox.Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
if his role changed then i am sure he has every right to ask for a new contract pr improved terms. It is standard practice!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebus
But then again its afc we are talking about. The cheap way is the best way.
He should have renegotiated it when he signed his last deal then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebus
How can his agent claim "poor player" if he negotiated a shit deal for him in the first place?
That's the thing though, isn't it?
People complain that we pay our young players too much, and their contracts are too long, well this is a prime example.
I bet he fuckin loved that contract when everyone thought he was shit.
Errm standard practice anywhere is that when your role change, the terms of your contract br reviewed.Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-arc...r-to-barcelona
Official.
Thread >>>>>
Never liked the ****
Well yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
OMFG, how can *insert player not leaving arsenal here* be on that much money.
OMFG, Song is leaving. Why didn't we pay him more!
OMFG, I have no earthly idea how a business works, and I think we should go to the supermarket and buy Messi. Now!!!
:wave:
Off to Other Football you go.
They can't even afford picture hooks. How will they be able to afford Song's wage demands :oQuote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
You'd be pretty broke if you were an agent that suggested otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Killed_Kenny
Omfg, i have no clue about contracts. So if my role changes in my current job i should be happy with my origunal contract and not bother asking for a raise. Footballers get paid too much so why should basic terms of employment not apply to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
But his role hasn't changed since he signed his last contract.Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
Don't be stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
They are sitting at the hovertable.
People complain that we pay our bench warmers too much which means we can't pay key players more. That's the silly part. Also, Song's replacement will probably cost us around £15m plus £60k - £75k in wages. That's if we're going for someone experienced. Whoever we get has to be a lot better than Song if we're going to pay a huge fee and wages. It makes no sense to bring in a lesser payer yet pay him more than what Song was asking for.Quote:
Originally Posted by LDG
Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
if you want to blame anyone blame his agent for getting his client a fucking shit contract dont blame the fucking club ffs. song never moaned about it when he was unproven did he? his agent got him a shit deal then blames us?
Which would indicate that there was more truth in what the club said about him than what his agent/camp etc are saying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
How do you know?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebus
'Massively committed to Arsenal' so kept trying to re-negotiate. Had 3 yrs left, you've just admitted he was committed to getting more money
from @sianymacalarny on twitter. spot on
because his job is to play football, how can that role change?Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
There is also the possibility Wengwe wanted him replaced.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
Oh dear.Quote:
Originally Posted by ollie the optimist
You do realise there squad roles,first team roles and key member roles in the team?
There is also the possibility that we sold him cos players are bought and sold in football all the time and not every transfer needs to inspected to the smallest detail
Yes. For asking for improved termsQuote:
Originally Posted by GB.
Wait.....what?Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
Your face needs improved terms.Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
And songs hasn't changed for the last 2 or 3 seasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by gooners
:gp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ach