Originally Posted by
HCZ_Reborn
That the deal was easier to complete doesn’t suggest that it was prioritised. In that it’s clear we aren’t working on one transfer at a time. You are basically saying if Madueke’s signing was held up until we signed a striker, we would have had far less agitation from the fan base and whilst I don’t disagree with that, I think that says far more about the fan base.
I think long ago it was decided what the club needed in terms of players in, players out etc. Gyokeres it seems like we kept him on the back burner till a few weeks ago because although I’m sure the position was a priority, he individually wasn’t as he was second choice to Sesko.
We didn’t prioritise a backup goalkeeper over Zubimendi, it was just an easier deal to complete because we have a good relationship with Chelsea. Now we can argue all day about whether we should have a good relationship with Chelsea, and as I absolutely despise that club you probably wouldn’t find me unsympathetic.
But additional to that Madueke and Kepa are players that Chelsea were willing to sell to keep up the pretence that they play by the rules, Zubimendi was a player Real Sociedad wanted to keep, same with Sporting Lisbon and Gyokeres. Where I think we do go wrong, is that I think we place far too high value on getting agreement with the player before going to the club, somehow believing that this gives us leverage over the club and it doesn’t.