Harbhajan gone
Anderson has 4
Printable View
Harbhajan gone
Anderson has 4
Harbhajan should have been outapparently. Damn you India and your veto of DRS.
Ah it doesn't matter now, especially given I am way behind. :lol:
:dance:
This is all set up.
Ceeeeumon.
It was Raina who got away with it.
Thank god for that cos hes needed
I'm having a shocker tbf.
Kumar gone
Broad with the wicket
Broad.
:bow:
Khan with a runner
Awful review there from Strauss.
Bat was nowhere near it
Raina gone
Anderson has 5
It's on!
Excellent.
:dance:
Sharma gone
Broad with the last wicket
England win
On to the 2nd test
GET IN!
England. :bow:
MOTM award soon
Likely winner? For India, theres Dravid after his awesome century, Kumar who got 5 wickets in the first innings, Sharma with the best bowling and getting 4 wickets in a short space of time, Tendulkar for being Tendulkar :bow:
England - Anderson with 5 wickets, Broad for being hit for 6 sixes in an over against Yuvraj :pal:
South Africa - KP with his 200 and Prior for his 70 odd in the first and century in the 2nd
Tough decision but id go for Tendulkar
Sachin :bow:
KP gets the MOTM
Unlucky Sachin
Zaheer Khan out of the 2nd test.
Cook already out :lol:He's a bit shit.Team news is Bresnan is in for Tremlett and for India, Sreesanth and Yuvraj in for Khan and Gambhir.Broad :lol:
Pleased yuvraj is in. If he survives the first 30 balls he faces, it'll be choas.
Pietersen is plum but not given. SA sure do get away with a lot in england
KP and just now Strauss has gone
80 odd for 4.
And now Morgan gone :lol:
85-5
This guy is shit
Things are more interesting when it's 11 vs 11. Bowlers seem to be more fresh when they're not bowling 737372 overs because the best bowler is injured. Can't believe PK is taking wickets...fucking 72 mph.... I can bowl faster than that.
Kumar has been pretty awesome tbh.
Also the England batsman are dumbasses. If they actually tried to whack him around at that speed, they'd never get out but they block him for some reason and he keeps finding the edge.
Blocking and leaving fans :pal:
88-6
Prior fucks off
Sreesanth :bow:
As Syn said, 11 v 11, England dont have a chance
Oh dear. 1-1 then.
Don't know...you can't really call any of the England lineup tailenders (apart from Morgan). Bresnan, Broad, Swann can all bat and Anderson can be quite handy for a 20 not out.
We'll have to rely on them to bat twice now I suspect. I guess there's still a chance of India being skittled out too.
Broad :bow:
Swann :bow:
Broad in his 60s
PLayed well
60 off 62 balls
Why cant the more established batsmen play more positive?
Also the ball to get Swann out was immense. Kumar :bow:
Broad gone
221 all out
India :bow:
Harbhajan with the wicket but more importantly, Sachin with arguably the greatest catch of all time
Mukund :doh:
Out first ball
0-1
India 24-1 at the close
That was dull
How do part time batsmen in Broad and Swann score so quickly and entertainingly whilst world class batsmen in Dravid and Laxman bore the fuck out of everyone?
Swann btw went for an xray
That's a poor attempt. You wouldn't have said anything if you found it truly boring. That was an amazing 15 overs at the end. England's bowling was flawless and Dravid and Laxman were god-like in their technique and defence as always.
Against bowling of that quality, I'd say there is nobody in world cricket apart from Laxman and Dravid (and I include Tendulkar in that) who could've survived that spell. Every ball was 85-90mph, swinging, seaming away just outside off and then suddenly, the inswinger would jump up to ribcage. Unplayable for 99.999999999% of batsmen.
Dunno. Anyway, good stuff.
Same question was asked to the pundits by the SSN lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Syn
Fair play to Michael Holding. His answer made sense.
in county cricket, david masters took 8-10 off like 6/7 overs today. essex bowled leicestershire out for 36 :lol:
bopara got 178 as well
Bopara :bow:
Laxman 50 :bow:
PLayed rather well today after last nights shocker
Bresnan gets Laxman.
Mr. Reliable. :bow:
FInally we have a wicket.
And here comes the little master :bow: