Why is there such a massive margin of error in cricket, when tennis goes to the millimetre?
It seems so overly cautious.
Printable View
Why is there such a massive margin of error in cricket, when tennis goes to the millimetre?
It seems so overly cautious.
:haha:
Oh this is going to be fun. Rogers given not out because the original decision was for being caught and he didn't hit it, umpire's call has appeared on the DRS review though as it would've been out on LBW had it been given out on that basis.
I guess because in Tennis, it's what has happened, where the ball has landed, whereas this is predicting where it would go after the ball has landed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suarez Is Boss
England players had a '1-1 at Newcastle' moment when the Umpire's Call image appeared. :haha:
Yeah fair point.Quote:
Originally Posted by McNamara That Ghost...
49-3, Broad gets Clarke for 6!
Aussies 75-3 at lunch.
76-4, Bresnan gets Smith! :bow:
Watson in. He has his opening wicket partnership after all. :lol:
Bunsen Burner of a pitch. :bow: