Who asked you? It's a discussion. If you want something lighthearted and different, feck off to the general section or anywhere outside of the Arsenal DEBATE section. Jeez!
Printable View
He's firmly third choice at Chelsea.
No Charlie, the argument changes regularly to suit the latest point being made.
As for Wenger's wage, he could have commanded similar elsewhere, no problem. I recall Wenger mentioning a discussion with and agent where he stated that if there were no money in the game, he'd still be here whereas the agent wouldn't.
I think there are many things Wenger can be criticised for, not bleeding red and white aint one of them.
Think of it this way, if we were winning trophies like in the old days, I'm sure there would be players willing take a pay cut. Arteta jumped at the chance to join us because it was his last shot at the big time. He'd never get this sort of opportunity at Everton. Cesc took a pay cut at Barca because it was a massive opportunity.
But since we're not winning trophies and don't pay our top stars that well, why stick around? It's a lose lose situation, especially when they know other clubs are after them. Clubs that will pay them well and also going after silverware each year.
Why do you think I'm using Wenger as an example of a well paid guy that's happy to compromise?
You should also check Almunia's recent comments and why he was happy to sit on the bench.
:lol: Take it to the film thread and discuss light shit over there if this too much for you.