Originally Posted by
Niall_Quinn
I don't think we were spent, not all the players anyway. I think the players were too inflexible in dealing with a brighter than expected Newcastle. Against city we saw Partey snapping into challenges and distributing the ball upfield. Against Newcastle he was marking empty space in the middle and had reverted to ball retention instead of distribution. Havertz played with his back to goal. Martinelli was receiving the ball in coverage rather than having it played into space in front of him. Yes you could say that's because Newcastle had a more energetic midfield than city, but I don't think it was that, I think we were less aggressive than in the city match, which may have come across as looking tired.
It was bad tactics. We knew Newcastle could play on the break and we didn't really have anything in the locker to counter that. We should have been taking advantage of them playing on the break, encouraging them to do it so we could get the ball back when they were at thir most vulnerable. Trouble is our defence didn't have the best of nights because I don't think they ere supported as energetically by the midfield.
It was interesting, all I could find last night was a stream with no sound so I watched the game in silence. No opinions from the commentators, just what I saw happening on the pitch. Rice, our MOTM on Sunday, and particularly Partey looked like they were refs rather than players, almost as if they were delibertly trying not to get in the way. Partey was often 30 yards off the play. As if we were fearful of what Newcastle could do. Bad tactics.