Theo is currently way ahead of Jack. We love Jack because of his heart on sleeve attitude, but he is still young, and green at times on the pitch.
Printable View
Jack still has a way to go, especially after being out for so long. His final ball and shooting needs a little work and will have to start dominating the midfield more and dictating play.
But we're paying him a handsome fee to try and ward off other clubs and to keep him happy. I wouldn't say it's based on merit or past performances. If the club has no problem paying inflated prices for our young players, then why not pay something a little more competitive for our experienced players that have actually performed for us over a number of years?
Rumours say that he has agreed a 4 yr deal worth 90k pw, will be announced tomorrow.
We'll see.
90k a week + 3m signing on free, apparently. Now it's just a matter of when it's announced, expected to be next week.
Good. :good:
Now that wasn't so hard now Arsenal was it :rolleyes:
the drop in interest for zaha completely correlates with break-through talks with theo, which is worrying. did the board really think zaha was a capable replacement for theo?
The board thought it would be the minimum required to keep us quiet. Probably.
Personally I don't give a shit any more because we are dogshit for the foreseeable future.
YEAAAHH! :patrice:
need him to sign asap. it was the one ace card wenger held to not signing anyone this transfer window.
'our transfer target is to tie theo down to a new contract'
well he wasnt expecting theo to sign so quick. nowhere to hide now.
what a conman. banked £56m in the past 8 years. what have we done meanwhile? nothing.
hail the genius. sorry i mean rich genius.
I realise that for the good of the team this is probably for the best.
That teams are about partnerships, and that established players who make a tangible contribution are critical.
That stabilty is key, and that you can't build a team if you are constantly dismantling it.
In the context of this dysfunctional side, Theo Walcott is probably one of our most important players.
But fakk me this is underwhelming.
£90k with a £3m signing on fee? Christ.
Expect him to be crap once he's signed up.
I agree with the notion it's underwhelming, in this current side he's important as we're so average but it's not something I'm finding myself getting very excited about.
This is the first time we've managed to hold onto a player for a while if this is true, but I wish the first time we managed it was to keep hold of one of those world class talents we lost in the past.
To summarise: I'm not bovered
I've never been that bothered, I've said as much before as well as I'm not a big fan. My favourite players have largely left now, there's a couple I think are decent but that's about it now, in the 90's even with an average team we still had the likes of Wright, Adams, Seaman (proper Internationals) now who do we have? Wenger has properly screwed us over, I can't stand him!
I'm more interested in who we do sign, or even who we don't!
I think keeping Theo is wonderful news.
For once, we will have continuity within the squad. Theo, Jack, Oxlade, Sczesny, Gibbs are the future of the club and if we can tie the backbone of the club down, I am very glad. One of the biggest mistakes we have done under Wenger was to let experienced players go just because they got 'shit' or werent at their best. While we banked good money on a crocked Henry, past it Vieira, Lauren, Gilberto, Toure, what we fail to understand was that these players had an influence in the dressing room. They knew what it is to win and fight for the club.
While Theo hasnt won a thing of note, I still feel continuity and someone who has been at Arsenal for so long re-signing for us is nothing but great news! Now to get the dead wood pieces of crap like Ramsey, Denilshit, Diaby, Rosicky, Arshavin to fuck off, so we can get in some new exciting faces!
90K! Football is bat shit crazy. Then he needs a signing bonus on top, greed like that is hard to comprehend. Still, he's probably better than whatever shit we might have replaced him with because there was little chance of us signing a proper striker. Bit sad though if Wenger intends to play him through the centre, RvP to Walcott is a massive step backwards that now won't be fixed for the next couple of years at least when we can expect the same saga and another big pay demand while courting city and the chavs to force the issue. He's a horrible little **** who should be nowhere near this club and I have little doubt his form (if you can call showing up 40% of the time "form") will drop now the money is in the bank. But if we can get a handful of games out of him over the next 24 months then I guess that will have to do. He hasn't managed it in his career yet, that's the worry.
Brilliant news if true. Excellent player who's stepped up when others have disappeared. Legend status is almost guaranteed. From RVP to Theo, a step up in class, loyalty and eventually quality.
^^Quote:
10:25 GMT: Despite some bold reporting elsewhere yesterday that Arsenal forward Theo Walcott had penned a new contract with the club, the BBC's David Ornstein has tweeted that there is no such deal in place: "Walcott has not agreed new deal (#afc yet to make offer & no formal talks) but could happen soon. Walcott wants to stay & football side sorted. If compromise reached on salary & image rights could happen quickly." (@bbcsport_david)
Arsenal: Ok, 90k
Theo/Reps: 91k
Arsenal: Ok, £90,001
Theo/Reps: 91k
Arsenal: Ok, £90,001.50
Theo/Reps: £91k
Arsenal: Ok, £90501.50
Theo/Reps: £91k
Arsenal: Ok, £90751.52
Theo/Reps: £91k
Arsenal: Ok, £90991.57
Theo/Reps: £91k
Arsenal: Ok, £91k
Theo/Reps: £92k
Sell the over-inflated opinion of himself git and splurge a little money on a real striker for once ffs a la Falcao.