Good Bye RVP!

the funniest part is some of you thinking wenger is still going to sign another striker on top of what we already have. absolutely no chance.

if rvp goes, giroud is main striker and podolski back up. theo will also get more game time up top.

if rvp stays then we have 2 strikers (him and giroud) battling for 1 position. podolski gets less game time up top. in fact i doubt he'll even feature as a striker. theo also stays on the wing.

Meanwhile, in the Man City boardroom...

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs2/1444385_o.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm

Meanwhile, in the Man City boardroom...

http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs2/1444385_o.gif

---

I didn't know Nasri could sing :o

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory

Around about page 19 we're talking about the wage structure, whose involved with contract talks....etc.

http://www.goonersweb.co.uk/forum/sh...ighlight=nasri

---

that link doesn't work

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ach

http://www.goonersweb.co.uk/forum/sh...ighlight=nasri

Nasri thread

Im bored

---

Follow this one.

you want to point out to me my previous arguments - you do the leg work matey!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Terry Tuffnutz

you want to point out to me my previous arguments - you do the leg work matey!

---

:lol: From page 19 onwards. I haven't got time to repost everything. It goes on for a few pages. It's not as if you can't read.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LDG

Yes and no. I mean, they would have known there was a distinct possibility, and in all likelihood, the gag on RVP was until Giroud had signed.

Though, I do think they hoped he may change his mind.

As it is, he effectively burnt all his bridges with the statement (which I thought was a pretty low blow for someone of his percieved good character).

And as far as the club go, it also shows that we're not as willing as some might want us to be, to keep him. We keep saying, he's getting on a bit, and if he wants a four year deal for big bucks, it seems ridiculous to pay him over the odds if he is likely to get less and less playing time in two years time.

It's forward planning by the club. Which we should actually be happy about, rather than moaning about it.

Doesn't mean that we don't need further options up top though, so lets just hope that all of it is sorted as quickly as possible.

---

This. Pretty much encapsulates how I view the situation.

If this was a replacement signing, and everyone was aware he was leaving, then I don't see the point of his released statement, or rather the tone of it. Rocking the boat would have been redundant and counterproductive and I suspect something happened during the 'crunch' talks.

It would be truly bizarre if the only forward we didn't sell this summer was Park.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory

:lol: From page 19 onwards. I haven't got time to repost everything. It goes on for a few pages. It's not as if you can't read.

---

Jeez does it really matter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Japan Shaking All Over

Jeez does it really matter?

---

Yes :angry:

Nobdy can win the internet without facts :angry: