Income from TV - Less than Tottenham

ESPN have hardly shown any of our games this season. Cancelled my subscription and won't be going back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by latewinner

That's disgusting. They have one decent season where they're above us for a while for the first time ever and already they're on TV more than us and not by a small margin. 4 more game than us? WTF have they done to deserve that. Not only that Liverpool shown 4 more times than us with their horrible dull season.
So what's wrong with us. Do the people who decide this think more people want to watch Tottenham. Chelsea too were on TV more. Is our image less interesting than these clubs.

---

The difference is in the facility fees - they charged more - and the merit payment - we earned more. Says it al really.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coney

The difference is in the facility fees - they charged more - and the merit payment - we earned more. Says it al really.

---

Can't see our board charging less than anyone - suggestion casts those figures into very serious doubt.

Peculiar thread, there's so many variants to this. From October Arsenal didn't really have any games that had that much consequence, Spurs were competing for the title until around February time. Man City were throughout, Chelsea were closer for a while, then watching their collapse was good TV.

Add to that Spurs, were in the E.L, so were the Manc clubs, and a lot easier to schedule Sunday & Monday matches when you're playing you league match on a Sunday. When you're in the C.L Tuesday nights, you're limited for slots & the Police will have their say.

Once they're out the way, whether watching Villa, Stoke or Sunderland park a bus for 90 minutes isn't the most appealing thing to watch and we've probably got our least inspring crop of players for a generation.