Did Walcott dive for the red card?

It was a dive and I hope we continue this form of cheating in future games. We need all the luck we can get for our title push

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn

If true, that was the most pathetic starfish I've ever seen. He had his arms by his side FFS.

---

He's making it in his own stylie I believe he calls it "The Salmon"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joker

Not really ridiculous when even Arseblog also thought it was a dive.

---

It is, because:

a) It wasn't a dive.

b) Who cares if he did? We've been done over by cheating opposition for years, yet you prefer to create a thread damning a player who contributed heavily to a good result.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Master Splinter

It is, because:

a) It wasn't a dive.

b) Who cares if he did? We've been done over by cheating opposition for years, yet you prefer to create a thread damning a player who contributed heavily to a good result.

---

Here's a replay which shows it was a dive: http://arsenalist.com/video/?id=xlaa1n

It matters because the press will make a big deal of it, and referees will become aware of Walcott's reputation, meaning we'll fail to get genuine fouls because referee's have in the back of their mind that Walcott has previous when it comes to diving.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joker

Here's a replay which shows it was a dive: http://arsenalist.com/video/?id=xlaa1n

It matters because the press will make a big deal of it, and referees will become aware of Walcott's reputation, meaning we'll fail to get genuine fouls because referee's have in the back of their mind that Walcott has previous when it comes to diving.

---

Its a good thing.. may be it'll give us the siege mentality of us against the world and we can rack up some wins.. COYG!

It if was good enough for the likes of Ronaldo, Rooney and Gerrard, it is good enough for Theo.

glad he dived.

we need to be more cuntish. something we lack from the invincibles era who were dirty fuckers.

hope he does it again.

Would prefer if he was good enough to shrug it off and smash the ball in the net.

But he's not so I suppose a dive is the best he could have achieved there.

Walcott was fouled and couldn't get to it so he stopped running and dropped to his knees. It was a partial dive because he didn't need to drop to his knees. Unfortunately these days - without video technology - you have to make it obvious to the referee that you were fouled, and Walcott did.Well played Theo. N.b. This is the only correct response. Cheers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joker

Here's a replay which shows it was a dive: http://arsenalist.com/video/?id=xlaa1n

It matters because the press will make a big deal of it, and referees will become aware of Walcott's reputation, meaning we'll fail to get genuine fouls because referee's have in the back of their mind that Walcott has previous when it comes to diving.

---

Hey everyone.....we have our answer to what Joker was to complain about in the event of something he obviously didnt want to happen......an Arsenal win

shit mate.......what is with all the hate.......dont get enough of something

I was curious whether Walcott could have stayed up......but who gives a fuck, we won!

how worried would you have been if a freekick was won, scored and Arsenal won 1-0 things happen every week, for and against........for example at least one Blackburn goal tht was offside but we have to accept that......dont remember you starting a thread about that