http://www.arsenal.com/assets/_files...riel_sign4.jpg
Done.
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-arc...icture-special
Printable View
Fuck me he's ugly - hope he tackles how he looks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
Don't think he'll be used for many of the kit releases. He also talks in 3rd person which is always amusing.
I dont understand some of these football players hairstyles. Dont they have mirrors at home? :sick:
I think the idea is don't look at me look at my cash. I bet it works too.Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
Provided he plays as scary as he looks then no problem (I mean the opponents being scared, not us).
http://www.arsenal.com/assets/_files...6MAFC_1819.jpg
The non-airbrushed version.
What a man :bow:.
Wenger :bow:
Green eyes, so cant be ugly.
Hopefully he is Brazillian mad like Costa and not Brazillian fairy like Gilberto and Denilson.
A little skinny and gaunt looking but aren't they all these days. We actually singed a fahhhhking CB at last!
Read somewhere that campbell signed a new deal just befor ehe went out on loan.
why?
Playing time and shop window in Spain then a big fee in the summer if all goes well. Otherwise back to the bench and decent enough money. Covers all his bases and not a bad deal for us either. Sounds sensible from all concerned, for a change.Quote:
Originally Posted by AFC Leveller
people going on about his looks but the best centre backs generally are a bit ugly - like Keown!
Cygan was handsome..Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_brighterside
Welcome Gabriel.
:bow:
I wouldn't comment on his look as he was bought to be a defender and not a model . I wonder what his game has to do with his look? For me , I would be happy if he could be a good alternative in defence and eventually kick one of Kos or Mert out of the first team , regardless of the way he looks .
Quite. But this is Gooniesweb. You know how they do.
Man, that's one ugly motherfucker! Why have we signed this ugly guy? Hard to believe.
To complement Letters.
Since he can play right and left back, should we or should we not blood him in as Right back, even though I'm quite happy with Bellerin playing there, and I think Bellerin is ahead of Chambers in that department because of pace.
When was the last time we bought a shit CB?
2010 - Squillaci
Let's give the boy the chance to kick the ball and adapt to our game first before we judge how shit or good he is .
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpha
He was lethal, in front of our goal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
:lol: That was actually quite good.Quote:
Originally Posted by She Wore A Yellow Ribbon
No more Monreal/Debuchy at CB Yay!!!
Chambers can concentrate on developing as a CB. No more of this RB expierimenting with him. Hes a good lad but with all the will in the world he will never be a good enough FB. Merts Kos, Chambers, Gabriel. Any two on any given day. Tho i wouldnt want a Merts Chambers partnership, if at all possible. This is the slowest combo and Merts doesn't usually impart the leadership a kid like Chambers needs.
Bad report for our youth team however. In 15 years no worthwhile CB has come through there. Maybe not since Adams himself last made the grade. Shit coaches or shit scouts, who knows. Maybe both.
Who cares what Paulista looks like? As long as he can play I am cool with that.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...o_1696780c.jpg
lolQuote:
Arsene Wenger says Gabriel's lack of English could cost goals
At the moment, he doesn't speak a word of English, and that can cost you goals," Wenger said.
"If you mix 'going forwards' with 'going backwards', it can cost you."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31054979
WUMger. :lol:
Half the time he's taking the piss out of the journos.
Surely?
What having you in charge of our defence "can f+*king cost us!!!!"Quote:
Arsene Wenger says Gabriel's lack of English could cost goals
At the moment, he doesn't speak a word of English, and that can cost you goals," Wenger said.
"If you mix 'going forwards' with 'going backwards', it can cost you."
Surely Paulista can pick up a few words like "Pass, forward, back, clear" before KO.. or is that too much to ask? May be the rest of the squad could learn those words in Portuguese to help him out. WUMger and his excuses are ridiculous!!
Not as ridiculous as you lot desperately finding any excuse to have another dig at Wenger whatever he does :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/...7e&oe=555516E9Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
Wenger has a point and allegedly a broadsheet newspaper will use about 600 English words. How many are used in common parlance on a football field minus the abuse to the ref, from the ref, the abuse from crowd, abuse to the crowd and so on...?Quote:
Originally Posted by fakeyank
100 words?
I think there is probably an issue with effort in speaking English. After all...why speak it if several people around you speak your language anyway....
Chortle! :dQuote:
Originally Posted by AFC Leveller
And not as ridiculous as you desperately defending Wenger and everything he does :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Letters
:lol: We needed a defender, we signed a defender.Quote:
Originally Posted by She Wore A Yellow Ribbon
I don't need to 'defend' that, it's obviously a good thing.
But, of course, Wenger is a wrinkly old French **** so now things are looking better you lot have to scrabble around making up reasons why everything is still wrong.
Cheer up, we might slip up today, or soon anyway :console: