If being an appalling shitbag were a jail-able offence the most Premiership clubs would struggle to field 11 players most weeks.
Printable View
If being an appalling shitbag were a jail-able offence the most Premiership clubs would struggle to field 11 players most weeks.
:doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Letters
Said by a man who has no kids. Thankfully by the looks of it.
She was asking for it.
So you think all crimes in the area are the same and what Johnson's done is as bad as what Jimmy Saville did?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano
Yes because that's exactly what I said.
Two-thirds of Saville's offences were based on inappropriate touching. This was one kid. This is where it starts for sick perverts. Unluckily for Johnson he was caught out. No doubt he would've carried on elsewhere if this hadn't of come to light. A man of his age, fame and wealth at worst could pay for any hooker he wanted to if he was that desparate. But he was clearly into something else. He just had a baby daughter, she'll hopefully thank her lucky stars when she's older that her mother saw the light to keep him at arms length when she was at her most vulnerable. So what is Johnson guilty of? Receiving oral sex from a kid and putting her hands down his trousers after grooming her. Johnson is a sick fucker who should be inside for far longer than 6 years. Which in reality will only be 3 years. The interesting thing here is how you can determine a difference between Johnson and Saville's mentality.
I'm pretty sure Kano doesn't think that Adam Johnson's offences were as serious as Jimmy Saville's, but it explains a lot of the guff in Arsenal Debate if people think that the view thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Reynholm
Crime 'x' is worse than crime 'y' is in some way condoning crime 'y'
Logic :rose:
Reasoning :rose:
I think the point here is that crime x and crime y are the same. 1 kid being touched up is still 1 too many.
Saville's offences were against kids as young as 8 and against multiple prepubescent boys and girls.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
Johnson's victim was literally months from the age of consent, had she been some months older he wouldn't be in prison.
I can't agree that those two things are equivalent.
It's quite a leap to suggest that their mindsets are the same or that Johnson would have gone on to target younger and younger girls and/or boys.
It's possible, but you can't sentence someone on the basis of what they might have done.
Kano seems to be inferring that because of his actions he would have abused his own daughter at some point. That's an even bigger leap.
Also, can you explain what you're inferring here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano
Seems like he was a filthy cunt.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/...nimal-11093218