Originally Posted by
Terry Tuffnutz
sure, the bench was weak but we're not debating that, we're talking about benny and his direct contribution.
gerv was the nas replacement and arteta supposedly the cesc one, we all knew that at the start of the season. few of us knew why we had taken him in but it was risk free given the zero cost and it worked out pretty well for a one season option really. he has been a squad player at pool and chelsea, so why would you think he now becomes a first teamer for us? clearly no-one else in or outside the club thought that.
i mean, with nasri and cesc in this team, how different would the season have been? i think we can both agree that it would've been the same. i not meaning to diminish their talent as they have more than benny but it's all about contribution in real terms and not 'potential' right?