Because it's a replay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchies
Printable View
Because it's a replay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchies
Bergkamp a bum? :lol:
Top, top quality WUMing.
Almost as bad as this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPX005dnOG4
he can do absolutely everything bergkamp could do technically, only difference is he scores more goals and gets on planes. I mean, bergy was getting like 5 goals a season for petes sake.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
his premier league peers are henry and ronaldo. no other forward has any business being mentioned in the same breath.
You obviously never saw him play.Quote:
Originally Posted by BOBN
Bergkamp was technically superior, some of his passing was sublime, and RVP can't do that. I remember some outstanding assists for Ljungberg at the tail end of the 01-02 season which helped us wrap up the league. Overall the better player IMO.
The biggest issue for me was not using the RVP money to buy a really top quality striker. Giroud is decent, but you can't replace very good players with simply good ones, that's regression.
yeah, that is :doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimandi's Perm
bergkamp was unplayable for about a year. early 98 till he bottled the penalty in 99. and even then he wasnt a problem the way RVP is a problem. defenders? they have a big problem.
You have a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by BOBN
Tbf RVP was/is way more productive than Bergkamp. He was the sole reason we didn't finish mid table last season. Bergkamp had way better players around him.
It's unbelievable that we won fuck all with RVP. I mean he's the best striker in the league by a mile and top 5 in Europe.
Such an utterance should be a bannable offence, imo.
I wouldn't even pass that as wumming.